I love the idea of a privacy-focused fronend for YouTube, but every time I visit a piped link, it just spins forever. Both on my Linux desktop and my Android phone.

Maybe I’m doing something wrong?

Here is the latest one I tried and failed to load.

    • TootSweet@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      I saw that. It’s not FOSS, though if that’s what you’re implying.

      Just reading over the license, it allows neither making modifications to the source nor commercial use. Allowing both of those would be necessary for it to qualify as either Free Software or Open Source. (And I’m not sure those are the only things in the license preventing it from qualifying as FOSS.)

      Source available ≠ FOSS. And Grayjay isn’t FOSS even if its source can be perused.

      • MigratingtoLemmy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        TBH I don’t really care that much as long as the source is available. Some talented dev can fork it if the project goes sideways. I’d like a webapp/desktop app too

        • TootSweet@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          Some talented dev can fork it

          Not without infringing copyright. At least not the way the license is written now.

      • over_clox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        They don’t give a flying crap if you modify the source and compile it privately for yourself, they just don’t want people or companies making profit from their works or distributing said modifications without their approval.

        • TootSweet@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          They don’t give a flying crap if you modify the source and compile it privately for yourself

          Then why do they leave permission to do so out of their license? (So far, at least.)

          they just don’t want people or companies making profit from their works or distributing said modifications without their approval.

          That’s called “proprietary.”