Recognizing fake news now a required subject in California schools::undefined

  • paraphrand@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    I’d really like to see the curriculum. And examples.

    I feel like this is not an easy task. I suspect if someone thinks it’s not that difficult, then they are not willing to actually use political examples.

    But maybe I’m wrong. I just don’t know. When I was in school NOTHING touched actual politics. Maybe that’s why I can’t conceive of how this will work when focused on that topic.

    What am I missing?

    Edit: When I say politics was never covered, I can give a weird anecdote:

    Shortly after high school I was with some friends and asked them about the conservative/liberal thing. And they asked me a few questions and then said I was liberal, I think.

    The kicker: one of the two friends went on to be a false elector who signed the documents in my home state on Jan 6th. I saw their name during the hearings.

    • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      It’s definitely not that difficult.

      We had these lessons in Lithuania in the late 90s though not on fake news per se just how to evaluate text sources. It’s the same stuff you get taught for paper writing but in reverse. Check sources and use basic logic.

      I don’t think politics are needed to be taught explicitly though, just basic logic concepts. For example, I do wish kids were taught about Baysian perspective outside of math settings. Just understanding that would eliminate a lot of misinformation dangers.

      • originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        critical thinking is against most religions. its antithetical to their being the source of ‘truth’ and ‘morality’

        the religious masses in the unites states are, to be blunt, morons. its designed that way.

    • scarabic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Simply teaching kids that they can’t trust everything they read online is 50% of it. Explaining how and why information gets posted and why anyone might want to share disinformation, how outrage porn manipulates us… now we’re at 75%. The rest is a common sense approach to considering the source of information, understanding a news organization vs. a blog, finding more than one source for information, understanding what Wikipedia is and is not.

      This is totally common sense and politically neutral.