• Koordinator O@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    10 months ago

    No, they most definitely should not! Implementing such a measure unnecessarily increases the difficulty for low-income families. Instead, there should be support for the installation or a tax reduction for those who have one. Let’s focus on making it easier for people to adopt environmentally friendly practices without making things more expensive.

    • orrk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      10 months ago

      tax reduction only really works to incentivize people that aren’t poor

    • JigglySackles@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 months ago

      A better option would be a discount on the electrical bill for having green tech installed. If you want to help poor families, help their month to month costs.

    • Bazoogle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      This is still blind to the fact that those families could be in much much worse condition in 50 years if we don’t drastically change our carbon emissions. The increasingly frequent and more dangerous natural disasters could very easily leave them without a home at all. Low income families will also be the ones to suffer the most when it comes to the worsening climate disaster