• Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    Also, it’s not clear if Valve is just comparing Steam Deck sales against other hardware Valve sells or against game sales.

    If its against other Valve hardware, the measurement of “top seller” is a joke.

    • Gabagoolzoo@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      1 year ago

      …what isn’t clear about it, Steam top sellers list has always been total revenue of everything sold on Steam. Even F2P games with microtransactions are counted.

    • Maalus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      They are comparing the totality of the value something has been bought for. So a $60 game needs to sell 10 copies, when $600 piece of hardware just needs to sell one. That’s been the reason why Valve Index was nr 1 for so long - it was very expensive, with purchases comming from the enthusiast market. Same thing for the steam deck - not many people will buy it, but it will be worth a lot of AAA games.

      • Gabagoolzoo@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        What other metric would you use to measure “top sellers”, flat units sold? $10 indies and games on sale would probably dominate that list. Seems the most sense to base it off of revenue.

        • BruceTwarzen@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah i don’t get it. People are underselling just how much that is. I can’t even buy one in my region, and i think there are many more. The number would be even higher if you could buy it worldwide like a game.

        • BlemboTheThird@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s not like they’re mutually exclusive. Seems to me like measuring by flat units sold is equally as useful as total value.

          • Gabagoolzoo@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Units sold is really only useful if comparing similar products. You wouldn’t compare how many yachts are sold in a year vs how many toothpicks or sticks of gum, by the same logic it makes no sense to compare a $500 gaming console to a $2 indie game either. Steam sells a lot of different products, I mean how would you measure F2P games which are not even sold by unit in the first place? How about DLCs? Software licenses?

            And I would argue the info is useless anyway. All the list does is give you rough idea on what’s making money on Steam, there are no specifics given. No one is using this data for anything serious.

    • firecat@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      It is a joke, Valve self proclaimed they sold their products in their website. We have zero evidence or 3rd parties to look into. They can lie and no one will know the truth.