Stolen from Deltachat

  • BReel@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    77
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    7 months ago

    At least when I open up Mac OS, it doesn’t show me a pop up ad telling me how XBOX CONTROLLERS COME IN SO MANY COLORS NOW click here to buy.

    I’ve gotten that pop up the last 3 times I’ve booted up my windows machine.

    Windows is great for gaming. But it’s the only thing I turn that machine on for.

    • mortalic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      54
      ·
      7 months ago

      Gaming on Linux is pretty legit now. I don’t even boot into windows very often. In recent memory, only one AAA game didn’t work out of the box for me that required booting into windows.

      • finestnothing@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        So far black desert online is the only game that I’ve wanted to play that I can’t on Linux (eac is awful). I know there are others, but it’s mainly fps games that bother with windows-only eac and I don’t play fps games all that much. Battlebit is probably the only fps I’ve been playing in the past few months, and they use/will be using a linux-compatible eac version which I’m jazzed about

      • XEAL@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        I gave up on trying BattleBit for free on Ubuntu 22.04 this weekend, no Proton or GE-Proton version would run that motherfucker.

        I didn’t feel like booting Windows.

  • Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    70
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    7 months ago

    Lol, is this meme for real? Most mac users would never touch Linux. Like, yes, they are both based on Unix… But come on now, this is just intellectually dishonest.

    Most Mac users, in my experience, have no idea how to operate anything without an apple logo on it.

    • treadful@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      7 months ago

      Linux users are in the (well constructed) tent camp in the local park that Mac users ride their electric scooters past while desperately trying to avoid eye contact.

      • TotallynotJessica@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        27
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        Linux users are the homeowners who build and fix everything they can, but look down on people that don’t find craftsmanship fun, claiming that they’re saving money by doing the work themselves. Good on you for having that hobby, but if you don’t enjoy it, spending time to learn those skills costs time that could be spent earning more money than you’d save. Paying an expert to do things you don’t enjoy is usually the cheaper option. They can be found almost anywhere, similar to how Linux users use Apple or windows products from time to time.

        Mac users are suburb dwellers who view their way of life as what everyone should aspire to, ignorant to the downsides of sprawl and reliance on cars to go anywhere. Commute times suck, while walkable neighborhoods with public transit make most people healthier and happier. There’s an important classist component, often bundled with racism, that underscores this ideal.

        Windows users are people that live in urban areas for work, trying to find reasonable rent or home prices as unchecked capitalism makes everything worse, but unaware why things suck. They get annoyed when people share their passion for handiwork, and dislike suburban folks for thinking they’re superior rather than the downsides to suburban life. However, because most people live this way, and live this way for work, they usually don’t have strong identities like suburbanites or handy homeowners.

        Homeless people are those who can’t afford computers, overlapping with actual homeless people, and rural people are those that don’t use computers more than they need to, socializing face to face and literally touching grass.

    • storcholus@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      7 months ago

      I think it still works. The user you describe doesn’t care about Linux, they just don’t like windows. So they would not wash their hands

    • LittleHermiT@lemmus.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      7 months ago

      A lot of software development in a corporate environment is using a Mac as the host. Not to say it’s the target build env. So id say some Mac users know Linux far better than you think. In my experience.

      • kamenLady.@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 months ago

        Some, that’s the point

        Where i work, we all use macs. I’m the only developer and all others are designers.

        They all look at me very oddly, when i open a terminal on their Mac and change some settings from there. They check if my changes are working and still keep that look, like if I’ve done something strange to their mac lol

    • LittleHermiT@lemmus.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      My Mac is such a slow piece of shit on Mac OS that it’s nearly unusable without installing Linux.

    • rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Generally I agree, but specifically a little fact - the most qualified person at my work is a Mac user.

        • rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          There have been Linux distributions certified as Unix in the past.

          When people say “Unix”, they usually could care less about certification.

          I’d still say that BSDs are Unix and Linux isn’t due to, say, kernels of Solaris and FreeBSD having some traces of similar architecture, while Linux is a completely different thing.

    • Syldon@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Mainly because Windows has more support. Software availability is the biggest draw to Windows. I would quite happily drop it in a heartbeat if Linux came close.

      • Hasuris@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        MacOS has no proper UI scaling for example. Something windows had for… I don’t know, ever? It was never an issue for me.

        For MacOS you need a little extra tool you stumble upon after hours of debugging that teels your MacOS what resolutions your display actually supports so MacOS grants you the option of your desired HiDPI resolution.

        It’s stuff like this that drives me mad when dealing with the fucking Mac I am forced to use at work.

        • mac@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          These features are for consistent stability. The more space/less space option under display is more than enough for most use cases.

          • Hasuris@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            So trash UI scaling is a feature? Try changing your display to a non-HiDPI one. Does this look good to you?

            • mac@infosec.pub
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              I’ve connected my Mac to 4k and 1440p displays and had no issues, in fact it was a pleasant experience.

        • Syldon@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          There is always going to be pros and cons when it comes to UI. Since Mac comes with a set size monitor, I can understand why there is little support for it. Although, as someone who needs PC glasses, it is a big remiss to not cater for disabilities.

          • mac@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            As in my other comment, the display menu in settings has options titled more/less space which increase or decrease the size of text and windows on screen, this is accounted for.

  • parascent@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    7 months ago

    Sorry but as a Linux user I found that Windows is better than macos. Macos doesn’t even have proper window management.

    • rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      My experience is the same, but still it’s a Unix-like system. People who fear Linux may do Unix-like things with it. It’s worth something.

      • DefederateLemmyMl@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Yeah, but none of the system tools and applications follow Unix-like paradigms, so it’s really only Unix-like in name. Sure you can launch a bash or zsh shell, but there aren’t a lot of useful things you can do with that without installing a bunch of third party tools like brew, so the experience isn’t all that different from having to install Cygwin or WSL in Windows.

        • rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          Yeah, but none of the system tools and applications follow Unix-like paradigms,

          Eh, WTF? It has normal Unix-like userland tools.

          but there aren’t a lot of useful things you can do with that without installing a bunch of third party tools like brew

          You can’t do much without a package manager under Linux either.

          Homebrew, macports, pkgsrc etc are all just ports collections, like the FreeBSD one. A pretty Unixy kind of thing to use, more so than apt or yum.

          I hate Apple GUI, but technically it’s almost as good as Linux to use.

          • DefederateLemmyMl@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            Eh, WTF? It has normal Unix-like userland tools.

            You don’t understand what I mean.

            I mean that you can’t really do much with those userland tools to effectively manage and configure your system. All configuration is abstracted away in a forest of xml files (i.e. /Library/Preferences) that’s as opaque and undocumented as the Windows registry and which you’re not supposed to touch other than with the approved GUI tools.

            MacOS applications never follow Unix principles either regarding file placement.

            So yeah while MacOS technically still is “Unix”, it really is a giant monolithic blob of shite built on top of the skeleton of what once was a decent Unix.

            • rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              7 months ago

              You don’t understand what I mean.

              Well, you haven’t been very specific with your language.

              All configuration is abstracted away in a forest of xml files (i.e. /Library/Preferences) that’s as opaque and undocumented as the Windows registry and which you’re not supposed to touch other than with the approved GUI tools.

              It’s been some time since I touched MacOS, but there is a CLI tool for editing those preferences. Not unlike gconf. Actually gconf is apparently inspired by that and the Windows registry you so conveniently mentioned.

              Not that I’m a fan, quite the opposite.

              MacOS applications never follow Unix principles either regarding file placement.

              “Unix principles” is the same as “Unix philosophy”, while you apparently mean Linux FHS. Yes, it’s understandably ignored. Yes, maybe it shouldn’t be.

              So yeah while MacOS technically still is “Unix”, it really is a giant monolithic blob of shite built on top of the skeleton of what once was a decent Unix.

              Well, see, comparing FreeBSD to Linux with its development path, for example, you might feel as if Linux was slowly moving in that direction as well. Linux users usually laugh at that sentiment and say that it’s evolution. So - MacOS too has what its developers considered evolution from what Linux/FreeBSD/… have.

              Ah, also X11 is not that integral and traditional for Unix, if you imply that as well. Sun had its SunView in the olden days. There were other windowing systems.

              • mac@infosec.pub
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                5 months ago

                To add with Linux being unix-like not certified unix, macOS doesn’t need to implement anything in Linux fhs style.

        • rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          Certification is irrelevant really. There are Linux distribution releases which have been certified, just like MacOS.

            • rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              5 months ago

              It would appear then that no MacOS before 14.0 Sonoma is a certified Unix. Which is obviously false. Which means that your implication that this page lists everything certified is wrong.

              I said “releases”, because these were specific versions a few years ago. Perhaps nothing relevant today was certified, still what I remember is not that different from the mundane Red Hat of the same year.

              Which is all useless talk cause when we say Unix as something important, we mean “genetic Unix”, as in something of being derived from the same code base, culture, philosophy, etc, not “legal Unix” as a trademark, because that’s not the only cool-looking word one can imagine to name an OS.

              So obviously BSDs are real Unix then, Linux is something weird and MacOS is bullshit.

    • mac@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Arguably Arch Linux also lacks proper Window management. The idea of macOS is to give you a solid base which is stable, functional and looks good. Then you can add your own window management type on top whether you want a Windows style one like magnet or a tiling one like amethyst.

  • model_tar_gz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    Mac users are at the sink right next to them also washing their hands. We don’t talk about the nasty things Linux users do with their hands.

  • lseif@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    in my opinion:

    software: mac/osx >> windows

    community/environment: windows/microsoft >> mac/apple

    if we’re solely talking about how good the os is, i would have to say mac. but considering everything else, i would prefer windows

  • HStone32@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    7 months ago

    Ehh, I’m not sure. In my experience, apple users are too tech illiterate to have any opinions on windows, not even incorrect ones.

    • MrShankles@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      I got haggled for being a macos user in college because, “pc was superior”. Turns out, that the CompSci people that gave me shit about my Mac, didn’t understand the difference between “PC” and "Windows’. My MacBook is still the best laptop I’ve ever owned. It literally survived having beer being pulled into it’s fan, and it’s battery turned into a balloon long ago… it still runs fine, almost a decade later (if I keep it plugged in). I was “tech illiterate” to people because I used a MacBook. But switching from windows to mac, got me comfortable with trying linux. It got me comfortable with being uncomfortable, because I was constantly trying to figure out how to “get this to work on macos”

      I’ve met a lot of tech-illiterate people over the years… and they all gave me less shit about trying something different.

      I don’t use arch btw

    • rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 months ago

      Well, “tech illiterate” is relative. Some people may be ignorant of how their desktop works, but do wonderful things with PD or something else for synthesizing music, which requires knowing lots of math and music theory and signal processing.

      Never be arrogant, please remember than people doing actual stuff - developers, business analysts, musicians, artists etc, and even lowly office workers sometimes, - are kinda more important than IT personnel. There are of course infrastructure and network admins who know their sh*t quite well and get paid accordingly.

    • helpmyusernamewontfi@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Yet everytime you open Twitter they act like they know what they’re talking about and send clown emojis whenever someone responds with a counter argument

  • MrMamiya@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    7 months ago

    I wish every time someone talked shit about operating systems they woke up having switched OS with their grandmother.

  • Ratulf@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    7 months ago

    I use all 3 for different things and I’ll stop using windows the second gaming hardware and games work somewhere else the same way.

    • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Have you tried Manjaro? Steam makes it pretty simple with proton (which is based on wine) to run games. (Or if you prefer, arch. Manjaro is arch with a gui installer)

  • Adonnen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    I much prefer Windows to MacOS. The fact it is missing decent tiling is a nonstarter. It’s too inflexible for my workflow.

    And sure, Windows can be maddeningly inconsistent, but what really destroys the experience is the constant ensh*ttification. I know a lot of people here hate everything about Windows, but for me, it only sucks because Microsoft designs it to suck.

    Not only are there ads and (some) first party lockin, I cannot trust they will continue offering updates, paywall feaures, restrict more functionality, or insert stuff like AI to mess up my workflow.

    I used to think reliability was just about stability and bugginess, but now I think it is about trust as well.