• onlinepersona@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    10 months ago

    I’m confident that Mozilla will follow suite sooner or later to make it easier for extension developers to make extensions for both browsers. Mozilla did that when manifest v1 came along, removed a bunch of functionality from Jetpack, and aligned with Google.

    • mint_tamas@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      10 months ago

      They implement Manifest v3 already for compatibility, but without the user-hostile restrictions.

      • onlinepersona@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        It wouldn’t surprise me if they removed features to make popular extensions work. Time will tell. I’m still salty about Jetpack.

        • TangledHyphae@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          What do you suppose Firefox’s goal or motive would be in removing features for the end user? Isn’t their purpose to compete with Chrome and be better?

            • sir_reginald@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              10 months ago

              you’re definitely right and it’s obvious that Mozilla can’t make Firefox as private as they advertise it because of their monetary interests (thus google is default, there are paid promotions in the home page, a lot of privacy features aren’t enabled by default).

              But at least they make a decent work implementing them and because it’s free software then other projects like Tor or Librewolf can enable all the privacy features, remove the trackers and release a damn good browser.