• Nougat@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    God does.

    And that’s why this is entirely a circular and nonsensical thing.

    • Zoolander@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      Of course it is. But you’re the one arguing against your definition of these terms, not their own. From a standpoint of furthering discussion, I’m an atheist. I don’t believe any of this. But I know what the religion dictates as the definition of who they are and, based on that, you’re wrong about how they view themselves and how they’ve defined themselves.

      • Nougat@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Again, history is written by the victors. It “just so happens” that the Pope is the Pope because the portion of the Catholic Church which says he’s the Pope has the social, economic, and political power to make that “true.” Which would be the case no matter which portion achieved that set of powers; we could just as easily be referring to a whole different set of Popes, past and present.

        I’m not talking about how they view or define themselves. If Catholic dogma wants to say that that’s what God intended, that’s fine. Neither of us has to believe it. If some other set of Popes ended up existing, that would have been “what God intended.”