Well, I’ll be damned. They finally won one it sounds like.

  • odium@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 个月前

    Epic never sued for monetary damages; it wants the court to tell Google that every app developer has total freedom to introduce its own app stores and its own billing systems on Android

    I wonder how this will work out. If the judge actually forces it, so many large apps might show up on alternatives like fdroid and greatly improve fdroid capabilities.

    • Squizzy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      7 个月前

      Fdroid better stay as FOSS and privacy focused. I don’t want to see Spotify or some subscription brand bullshit up there.

      • helenslunch@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 个月前

        FOSS does not mean “privacy focused”. It means the software is free (as in freedom) and the source code is open and available for modification and redistribution and there are already several subscription-based services on there that I am happy to support.

        • 768@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 个月前

          Artificial media scarcity subscription models are much harder to implement with licenses like AGPL, but personal data crawlers still pose tremendous risks, especially in the future of technology.

      • arthurpizza@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 个月前

        I don’t believe the F-Droid will ever be implementing any kind of payment processing through the app store.