• openrain502r@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Next tactic to stop adblocking: we will come to your house and break your fucking legs if you even THINK about installing ublock

    Then a few days later ublock removes it

  • Margot Robbie@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t really know how people can even use YouTube without ad blockers. Sitting through minutes of advertisement is not going to make me want to buy your product if I start mentally associating your product with frustration and annoyance. If these video ads are going to be repetitive and annoying, at least make them funny.

    It seems like there is nowhere on the Internet to get away from ads currently, even here, where you thought you are safe, you are now reading an ad for my newest movie (you know the one), now also available on streaming!

      • Margot Robbie@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m not cheap, I’m frugal, there is a difference.

        Paying Google for them to stop shoving ads in my face doesn’t feel like a good purchase and I don’t want to support that kind of behavior, and I’m smart enough to use uBlock Origin and ReVanced (Little bit of a struggle though.)

        It’s more about principle than anything else.

        • KinNectar@kbin.run
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          @MargotRobbie@lemm.ee As a creative on strike I would have thought you would have felt some solidarity with the content creators who make 50% of the ad revenue you are withholding from them by blocking ads.

          I pay for premium because I can’t stand ads but I do want to support creators with a share of my subscription, even though I know it is less than they would have made if I watched the ads. I thought maybe you would feel the same given you aren’t hurting for money either.

          I know it is not a perfect system, but I do appreciate the content creators I watch enough to want them get payed. I subscribe to Nebula too for this reason, though I admit I should use it more.

          @InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world

          • Margot Robbie@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Have you watched the ending of that movie? Refusing to participate in a broken system is always an option.

            If you would like to support your favorite creators, buying their merchandise or donating to them would be far more effective.

  • Crunchypotat77@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Man y’all really expect high quality, extremely diverse, and robust video streaming platform for free?!

    YouTube gotta pay it’s bills somehow. Why y’all ok with paying Netflix/prime/hulu or whatever but not YouTube?!

    YouTube don’t owe nobody free services. Get over it.

    • Nath@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is not what is happening. Google offers you a tier with advertising for free. If you’d prefer to not have the ads, you can pay a small fee, get no ads and also steam every song ever. I truly don’t see the controversy.

      It’s literally cheaper than a beer for a full month of this service, but people would rather spend hours of their time tinkering with settings instead. Personally, I don’t have that kind of time.

      • SeabassDan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        If I’m not mistaken, the “tinkering” necessary in uBlock Origin would take much less than the time you took to type out your comment. And no, it doesn’t cost less than a beer.

        You have a point, but the problem goes far beyond ads vs. no ads. There is definitely a lot of controversy, and you simplify choose not to see it, but don’t try to act like everyone else is just too dumb or too poor to see things your way when neither of those are true.

        • Nath@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          If I’m not mistaken, the “tinkering” necessary in uBlock Origin would take much less than the time you took to type out your comment.

          I did not say that applying today’s partiucar fix would take hours. For however long this fix works works. I said “people would rather spend hours of their time tinkering with settings instead.” Of course I use ublock myself, the web is appalling without it.

          As to the price of beer, that may be an Australian thing. But if you manage to get a schooner (425ml/15 oz) at a public bar here for less than $10, you’re probably drinking something crap.

          You have a point, but the problem goes far beyond ads vs. no ads. There is definitely a lot of controversy, and you simplify choose not to see it, but don’t try to act like everyone else is just too dumb or too poor to see things your way when neither of those are true.

          I see what people are complaining about. They’re acting like they are being forced to visit the website. A website that sits behind one of the largest and most responsive network/web clusters on the planet. A website that is somehow referencing over an Exabyte of storage, geographically redundant and presumabely being backed up. I work in this industry, on a network with over 1,000 servers and my mind boggles at how much infrastructure that takes. I couldn’t begin to estimate what is behind that simple YouTube web front page.

          Somehow, the controversy is that Google has the gall to want to recoup some of these costs. It costs a fortune for just the hardware. Then add the bandwidth. Then somehow they’re paying content creators to put popular videos on the platform. And they offer it all to you for free in return for watching some ads. Or alternatively, you pay $10 to not watch ads.

          • SeabassDan@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I see what you mean on that last point, but I think their profits are just insanely above what the average company’s looking at, which is probably why it seems like so much at face value.

            Just the data alone that they’re complaining on almost everyone out there would more than make up for what they spend. It’s most likely why Facebook and others are also free.

            As far as being forced to visit, there really aren’t many alternatives on the same level to where you can really say someone can easily do without. It’s what they wanted in the first place, so it’s not like this wasn’t something they weren’t planning for ahead of time.

            It’s a tough situation, I don’t know that I wouldn’t do the same thing in youtube’s place, but I don’t think simply accept what the big Corp tells us is the best path either.