![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/c47230a8-134c-4dc9-89e8-75c6ea875d36.png)
Without giving a reason? They’re invaders. If they go home they won’t be subject to killing.
Without giving a reason? They’re invaders. If they go home they won’t be subject to killing.
Besides, is killing Russians a good thing?
Yes.
Dude she’s a random civilian
Why do you care
This woman doesn’t seem like a Nazi lol
I literally just explained why this was a problem,
And I disagree. You haven’t actually shown me any evidence that he’s a racist. The best you’ve done is show me a statement by some random donor (???) who made a statement when ambushed by combative activists that was awkward. Whoop de fucking doo
They’re killing Russians, so their historical political leanings don’t really matter.
Why is he responsible for the statements of some random donor? I don’t know why he would need to address those comments, it seems like some activists ambushed some random person on the street and she said something which wasn’t focus grouped and sounded bad. If she runs for office I guess she should address them.
but he chose “argues too much” and “scream at”, then said he should talk “like normal people”.
This is a common argument against progressives from moderates, of whatever race or gender or religion. You can not like that argument, but the fact that it’s used commonly against the populist left kinda detracts from the “oh, this is a dog whistle”
When Latimer said Bowman is an “ineffective Congressman” because he argues too much, Bowman interrupted to say that he is “passionate.”
But Latimer responded, “You need to talk to them as normal people — you can’t preach and scream at them on the steps of the Capitol.”
Jamaal Bowman is known as one of the more firebrand politicians out there. Running against that is fair game, and pretending fair criticism of him is racism seems dishonest as fuck to me.
I think this is mostly evidence of Clinton preferring George Latimer. Endorsing someone is just saying that you like them for the job. I’m sure Bowman has endorsements, too.
…or is the point that Rep Bowman should be immune from primary challenges because he’s black?
Bowman is the guy who got censured by the House for that dumb fire alarm incident. Now he’s calling Latimer racist, and for what reason? Latimer seems like a very boring politician, not a klansman.
I’ll take them off of Denmark’s hands
Arab leaders are smart enough to know that attacking Israel would either lead to defeat or nuclear annihilation, and so, seek peace. Regardless of the wishes of the populace.
Okie dokie I guess
That’s still what Hamas says their goals are lol
It’s why they started this war. They wanted to head off Saudi normalization of relations with Israel
Dude that’s what they’ve said their goal is. Take your head out of your ass
There hasn’t been a sovereign and native state on that land since the Roman conquest of Judea lmfao
That’s always where this was going to end. That future was written on Oct 7. The only question is, how much pain it takes to get there.
It’s obvious that the Israelis view their withdrawal and end of occupation in Gaza as a mistake and that it’s time for them to undo that mistake
The answer is that the more death and suffering they can cause to civilian Palestinians, the more they can drive a cultural wedge between Israel and the Arab nations. Their end goal here is to get a friendly government in, say, Egypt and then win a war to conquer Israel with that foreign support.
Whatever you need to tell yourself to justify your thirst for blood I guess
Why is it hard to believe that the people who started this war don’t actually want it to end
So you admit that they are legitimate targets.
That’s a lot of words which don’t go to answer the question as to why the candidate has to answer for the supposed racism of one of his donors. I’m sure if we looked long enough we could find some donor of Bowman who has posted something calling for some nasty activities. But nobody does, because everyone understands that a politician isn’t responsible for the views of individuals who happen to vote for him unless he has solicited their endorsement specifically and celebrated that endorsement publicly.