Can’t argue with that. At the end of the day we are another mammalian creature that runs around killing, fucking, and shitting then we die. The ecosystem of today dying is of no consequences to the dinosaur, the wooly mammoth, or what ever critter that roamed these same lands. I say build the buildings big enough and strong enough for the sentience of tomorrow to unearth them and wonder. Wonder hard enough and we are reborn.
If the people won’t rise up for the sake of their own children then the only solution is to out spend climate change. Capitalism won’t save itself, it will monetize the downfall. So in a way these tech companies are doing exactly what their suppose to but not really what they should.
What about a little insurrection? You know, as a treat?
Yes yes, nothing can be done. All is futile. It’s always the same shit with you people.
I think inheritance should be allowed. I just think there should be restrictions on how they participate in the market.
the only merit it rewards are the possession of pre-existing wealth, the willingness to take risks with it, and luck.
And I disagree
You’re only thinking in terms of labor. Nepotism, inheritance, gives many a head start in terms of building capital. Removing these people from the market place would allow a more even playing field where actual ability would push people into higher levels of management and improve efficiencies for people who participate at lower levels of production.
But would a capitalist society that puts in safe guards against nepotism have better results for more people?
It’s OK you don’t like capitalism but the industrial revolution did happen…
People have made the argument for dumping nuclear waste in the ocean. I believe adding brine to existing brine resivours won’t be too much of a hassle.
Brine can be transported to different parts of the ocean? It’s a massive bodie of water. Widespread adoption would have to be massive as well to see significant increases in molar concentration.
It’s in the frame work of the capitalist idea. Like it or not. I’m trying to expose why it doesn’t manifest.
But if you’re framing “cheating” as against yours or my personal moral framework instead of law, that is not something you can expect everyone to agree with you on.
This is actually the supposition of my question.
But you’re not cracking the surface and it’s honestly really boring exchanging ideas with you. I don’t think I’ll carry on.
Meritocracy is built in. The better product; the greater amount of production; the higher efficiency; is supposed to be what drives capitalism.
If only nuance had any sort of value to the lay person.
I did. It was a whole lot of assumptions backed up with anecdotes all designed to come to one single conclusion.
Finding normalcy isn’t hard at all. It’s fanning the fire of discontent to effect real change that’s the difficult part.