• 0 Posts
  • 36 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 2nd, 2023

help-circle











  • Very much this. I was an exchange student in the US in 2005 and my US history teacher (yes, their history classes are commonly split between us and “rest of the world”) exclusively worked with excerpts from Zinn.

    I understood once I leafed through the official textbook. It was about as bad as you can imagine.

    So yes, Zinn is far from “objective” or “neutral”. It’s a deliberate choice because

    a) it’s supposed to counterbalance the terribly whitewashed school books and b) there’s a case to be made that no text, not even scientific ones, is ever truly objective or neutral because reality is a construct.

    The latter is a more philosophical debate, but nonetheless an important one. Since there is no single objective truth, you’ll usually dare better by considering varying interpretations of “truth” before making your mind up.

    In other words: you’ll never get the full picture, but if you assemble enough puzzle pieces you increase your chances of understanding the bigger picture, and, more importantly, you’ll gain a sense for when somebody is just off their rocker.








  • DrFuggles@feddit.detoLemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldBad day
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    I mean yeah, but it’s mainly funny because I had absolutely no idea what I was looking at. The color, pattern and lighting meant I really absolutely had no idea what I was looking at. A back? A sweater? A cat? A crotch? A knee? An ass? Something else?

    So yeah.