Mostly we just make up our own race. I’ve pretty much settled on “dark white”.
Mostly we just make up our own race. I’ve pretty much settled on “dark white”.
I really don’t understand their position.
Cats cannot make a moral choice so what are these folks going to do when they see their “vegan” cat take down a bird or a mouse?
The fact that domesticated cats are notorious hunters really does make this whole thing pretty fucking funny tbh.
I’m asking this purely out of naivety, not trying to make a point: are you saying that because there are removed comments there that seem balanced and pretty thoughtful but have been removed regardless?
This is honestly my very first time looking at a modlog so I’m trying to got understand how to read it.
When is science ever “conclusive”?
That very concept is anti-science.
Nowadays “the science is inconclusive” is used to weasel out of corners that grifters paint themselves into.
Scientific consensus now there’s a concept worth understanding and putting forth in arguments such as this one.
There’s a human centipede that goes from Putin to Trump to Musk. That’s why they are doing it.
Laugh quietly please. I still have a Meridian DAC that transcodes MQA. Among the gullible audiophile set there are tens of us. FML.
As a bedroom producer who spent his children’s college money on analogue synths: go fuck yourself asshole.
Is this real though? Does ChatGPT just literally take whole snippets of texts like that? I thought it used some aggregate or probability based on the whole corpus of text it was trained on.
Found the round-earther.
I’m still convinced that only person insufferable enough to lose to Donald fucking Trump in 2016 was Hillary Clinton.
You can hate it all you want but in some level it’s a popularity contest and she is utterly utterly unlikeable.
Her smarmy q&a with those millennials was a fucking PR nightmare.
I’m not going to bother arguing with you but for anyone reading this: the poster above is making a bad faith semantic argument.
In the strictest technical terms AI, ML and Deep Learning are district, and they have specific applications.
This insufferable asshat is arguing that since they all use fuel, fire and air they are all engines. Which’s isn’t wrong but it’s also not the argument we are having.
@OP good day.
You have inadvertently made an excellent argument for freedom of / unregulated speech online and in other spaces.
I know however that in practice people think the bad thing, say it and then find a million voices to echo it and instead of learning they become radicalised.
But your post outlines the idealistic view.
A tale as old as time. The old analyst developer with cobwebs behind his ears gets sacked because of CIOs shiny new materia. Only to be rehired within the quarter at a consultant fee the time his previous salary.
That’s not what I said.
What I typed there is not my opinion.
This the technical, industry distinction between AI and things like ML and Neural networks.
“Mimicking living things” is obviously not exclusive to AI. It is exclusive to AI as compared to ML, for instance.
Technically speaking AI is any effort on the part of machines to mimic living things. So computer vision for instance. This is distinct from ML and Deep Learning which use historical statistical data to train on and then forecast or simulate.
IIRC there was a random number generator website where the machine was hookup up to a potato or some shit.
LLMs (the models that “hallucinate” is most often used in conjunction with) are not Deep Learning normie.
Tangentially related: the more people seem to support AI all the things the less it turns out they understand it.
I work in the field. I had to explain to a CIO that his beloved “ChatPPT” was just autocomplete. He become enraged. We implemented a 2015 chatbot instead, he got his bonus.
We have reached the winter of my discontent. Modern life is rubbish.
Have a poke around at the pissy ass responses I’ve had to this comment then consider that Reality Bites was a love letter to an entire generation who felt this way twenty years or more before this article came out.
Failure to recognise history is the very DNA of the millennial. Bite me.
It’s your own fault for meatsplaining to them.