For which the original answer is insufficient, but I guess my clarification wasn’t eli5. The flavoring extracts do contribute calories but they are too low to be reportable by federal standards and many artificial sweeteners also have calories but are also too low to report.
How is this the top comment… Sodas are flavor extracts at their core. The amount of other things are just there to balance or optimize those core flavors. Sweet, salty, acidic, viscosity, color, fizz… All choices on top of the flavor extracts. Diet soda just substitutes sugar for low calorie sweeteners.
It’s not if you actually know what it is and what it’s for… A trustless public ledger.
This is why we have public funding and government and laws.
It’s ptsd from what your employer is giving you instead of a real bonus or better working conditions.
They cannot enforce this unless they remove the pharmacy. Just refuse and walk in.
Illiteracy and lack of comprehension is insidious
Not a default view
OP is an idiot. That’s like saying exposure to anything doesn’t precipitate a response. It does.
His response or change may be directly caused by his experiences. We also have no idea what their interactions were.
Harris needs to skewer the Republicans with the dirtiest shit imaginable that Sanders isn’t remotely capable of being, and then be normal after the win.
The issues Sanders cares about are important to resolve long term, but they will not win the election.
There are so many things you want to do or know that you are incapable of knowing or doing because you are too stupid to learn it. No amount of trying will be enough. Your specific brain is incapable. Not everyone has the same abilities to do or learn, but may want to if they could.
Banning clothing and makeup is insane. Any judge who upholds such a thing should be removed by any means possible.
Or right now while she is still young, relevant, and still gives a flying fuck. You always strike while the iron’s hot.
Nobody can mop that floor. His voters are not swayed by anything. At best you can eek out a couple points and hope it goes your way at the electoral college level.
No, my issue is that adult literacy is like 20%. Once you consent, condom on, you are now in a situation where whatever happens next is virtually impossible to prove, and proof is required to convict. All cases of withdrawn consent leading to an illegal act for any reason have a very high probability of being unable to be prosecuted due to being indistinguishable from a withdrawn consent compliance scenario or a full consent regret scenario, both are legal. The mere fact that initial consent put you into a sexual position means that either party can claim that consent was given at the time which is how you ended up in that situation to begin with… It becomes he said she said, which is a loss.
The unfortunate truth is no, at least not legally, and regret with consent is not assault.
Can’t prove shit. After the fact there is no way to discern between consent revoked after approval and any other scenario.
All melodies are free and open source. At best we can say an entire composition is copyrighted. If I take a composition I like and then make a new composition from it, it’s ok, but if a computer does it it’s not? That cannot be. It’s unfortunate, but that’s the direction things will go.
Long term capital gains isn’t as big a problem as asset backed borrowing which needs to be fixed. No point in cranking realized gains that hard when unrealized loopholes are far worse and don’t affect venture capital the same.