One old fart that vows revenge on his political foes.
One old fart that is the most progressive president in the last 40 years.
Take your pick.
When could they have fixed this?
Also pretty important if you want to supply white supremacist gangs in the US.
I think the movies are being counted here for some reason
You should just say republicans.
There arent any democrats doing that.
A government employee will be censored for the speech that that employee puts out, full stop.
Same way as if that employee put out a hate filled speech about gay people.
“The Affordable Connectivity Program filled an important gap that provider low-income programs, state and local affordability programs, and the Lifeline program cannot fully address,” said FCC Chairwoman Jessica Rosenworcel in a statement, referring to the name of another, similar FCC program that subsidizes wireless and home internet service. “The Commission is available to provide any assistance Congress may need to support funding the ACP in the future and stands ready to resume the program if additional funding is provided.”
Some US lawmakers proposed bipartisan legislation to extend the ACP in the months leading up to the deadline. But the bills languished in the face of inaction by Republican leaders who showed little interest in engaging with the issue. President Joe Biden and Democratic lawmakers have publicly blamed GOP leadership for allowing the ACP to end.
While your version jives with lemmy’s “both sides” reactionary bullshit, reality is quite a bit different.
No, it’s not, the governemnt can censor its own workers or speech that its workers make. The government can censor itself.
The first amendment doesnt apply to governmental communications.
Its the reason that things are able to be censored in public schools.
Thats a very interesting article, thank you!
Jihad is defined as “a struggle or fight against the enemies of islam.”
A jihadist is defined as “a person who advocates or takes part in a jihad.”
Im not sure why you’re trying to muddy the waters here.
Unless youre trying insinuate that every muslim living by their books creed is meant to engage the enemies of islam, which is another problematic stance.
This is an old version of the bat incendiary bombs that the us was researching during ww2 to attack japan.
Thats not the question asked.
Answer the question.
Do you think the protesters/gaza will have a better or worse time underneath that candidate should biden not win?
All i have to say is ‘project 2025’ is why it will be different. That should be pretty simple.
But continue if you must.
Which also is a pretty dumb thing to say.
And who do you think that would be?
Should biden not win, who do you think win?
Is he a republican?