![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/2665e448-91d9-484d-919d-113c9715fc79.png)
Don’t even have to kill, an injury that stops them from further adventuring would work as well. Could still have them as a consultant or whatever then
Don’t even have to kill, an injury that stops them from further adventuring would work as well. Could still have them as a consultant or whatever then
Personally I’ll use a guide if I’m really stuck but otherwise I try to go blind. And I use the wiki to find out where to get cool weapons
What would you call people who won’t vote for Trump but refuse to vote for Biden too because Gaza?
Edit: To be clear I agree with all the replies here
The consequences of not paying your lawyers, you only get shitty lawyers in the end
Now I’m picturing Putin ordering McDonalds from abroad and going through some convoluted process to get it imported
Got a better idea?
I think the point was that the polling requirement was how it USED to work, but this election season the parties are holding their own debates with their own rules. I don’t have a source on it myself but I think that’s the claim here.
RFK Jr wouldn’t be invited regardless though.
Cybertruck is a bad comparison, everyone already knows that thing is a steaming pile of hot garbage.
Specially when you see the stats and it has a 190-250 mile range and a max speed of 81 MPH. And even the article points out they cut costs with things like having only one windshield wiper.
That website is using the nations carbon footprint as a part of their measure of happiness which I find confusing. Carbon footprint is important sure but it doesn’t relate to happiness and gives undeveloped countries an advantage.
At the end of the day, while living in the US does have its share of issues, they absolutely do not compare to living in Africa.
There is a world of difference between getting a bike lane installed and getting the world superpowers to collectively stop polluting.
Safe shots now just bounce off the armor entirely so trust me it’s easy to tell if you’re on safe. Anyway here’s video proof of a guy testing it on unsafe mode: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=4qWchqvay44
He can get it in 3 if he gets a high charge buts it’s more like 4-5 on average.
It’s not technically a weak spot, doesn’t take weak spot damage. Whereas an exposed leg DOES take weak spot damage
The leg is the closest thing to a weak point that a charger has, though.
It’s not the same potential, though. It takes about 4 unsafe shots to strip chargers leg armor for example. Before it was 2 safe shots. That’s over twice as long and twice as much ammo.
Oh I thought you meant the machine gun as in the support weapon machine gun, my bad. Forgot about the emplacement one
Aside from the HMG and recoilless both being support weapons, it’s not really feasible to use the recoilless if there are multiple of them, not to mention ammo concerns
Nevada being into “black bussy solo” fucking sent me