SavedKriss

Fixed the link.

I already expect that the IDF will exterminate as much civilians as it can. After 14000 palestinian children killed what else can we expect?

Why would you tale a road bike on a off-road track? Even the mildest rock at an angle can destroy that kind of wheels

The news says no. The target was a tent refugee camp.

At least 40 civilians dead (men, women and children).

The wounded are in the hundreds.

And today IDF bombed a refugee camp in “retaliation”.

deleted by creator

Anyone who wants to thwart the establishment of a Palestinian state has to support bolstering Hamas and transferring money to Hamas. This is part of our strategy — to isolate the Palestinians in Gaza from the Palestinians in the West Bank.

Benjamin Netanyahu, 2019

Wouldn’t it be easier to hardcode in the servers an entire encyclopedia instead of trying to limit a generative model to give only “right” answers?

Come to Italy, we have precarious jobs, low wages, high taxes for the middle and lower class, widespread tax evasion, companies that delocalize like it’s hot, high rents, high interest on credit, zero maintenance for our infrastructure, an understaffed public sector (-50% in some cases), rock-bottom transparency on public spending and a predatorial managerial and politic class. What’s not to love?

How could anyone, local or immigrant, afford to have 2.1 babies in this place? No shit the population is growing old.

1. It’s not an LLM, it’s a GAN and it’s inner workings are very different.

2. If that 1/6th has the most positive feedback in recognizability, for the GAN it becomes a high weighted part of the standard. These model’s categorizing flow favors unique features of images.

The algorithm is optimizing for results that are rated as precise, not just frequent.

Does it help the model to produce images that are indoubtably “american” for it’s raters or for it’s automated rating system? If yes they are statistically significant. Low frequency and systematic rarity can be both significant in a statistical analysis.

Are you sure?

Maybe you are confusing “traditional” with “religious”.

Pick up a dictionary, or even better, an encyclopedia.

Probably they don’t because it’s not context appropriate, as we all do with our dresses. More so if you and them live in a state or city with a different dress code. These things strongly depend on context.

For generative models though, they produce usually the most stereotyped answers possible, with a pinch of randomness, so we shouldn’t be surprised about this phenomenon. They are rewarded by these things.

A traditional dress is not a religious dress, it’s a dress used for a long time for it’s usefulness or fashion.

The historical use of the turban is fascinating, spanning for millennia and in a lot of regions and ethnic groups of the world.

I suggest the wiki page for further info, more precise than I have on hand.

An excerpt about the Pagri:

In Rajasthan state of India these turbans, known as Pagri or Safa, is a traditional headwear that is an integral part of the state’s cultural identity.

My point was (but it might be lost in sarcasm) that being the “hat” of Indian kings, nobles and emperors for millennia, we have a lot of drawings and also photos of Indian people with turbans, that most probably these generative models have been trained on.

On a footnote: why should the concept of a traditional dress be offensive? A lot of human groups have one.

Edit these are the words most associated with “Pagri” in english. It’s a matter of data.

What a surprise! A traditional outfit appears statistically significant to a large statistical model and shows more frequently. What a novel finding. I’m flabbergasted! What will be next? CEOs in jacket and tie? Dogs with fur? Why my 512x512 picture of a Inuit in a snowfield doesn’t portrait the subject wearing a bikini? Why can’t meta read my mind? WHY, MARK? WHHHHY?

Like you are 5: Wayland is a bunch of commands that your computer needs to draw the things that appear on your monitor.

Elon Musk pushes for $56bn pay deal for Elin Musk.

ThereIFixedIt

Conmen gotta con.

deleted by creator

You forgot void