“Something for everyone.” = “I sure hope everyone buys this shit!”
“Something for everyone.” = “I sure hope everyone buys this shit!”
Expecting an empty, repetitive open world game. Hoping to be wrong.
Naw, they will only persue after the election. No way would they risk displeasing their potential king. Especially if he is saying he will throw more tax breaks their way.
Pretty smart move actually. If Harris wins, the legal action will continue regardless of who he voted for. If trump wins and he finds out that Rudy voted against him, that would arguably be worse for him.
Basically, Goodrazi got touchy when asked about his organization’s efforts to neutralize government-spearheaded free tax filing programs. He hit back that Patel’s question — the editor said that Intuit is “legendary for lobbying against free direct federal e-filing” and then straightforwardly asked how much of their budget is allocated towards lobbying efforts — was “fundamentally” based in the “wrong premise” and was “inaccurate,” before declaring that Intuit doesn’t “lobby against free.”
Most likely the 3 people in their think tank who know fully well what the end goal of the MAGA movement is.
Don’t worry, according to undecided/centrists, it is all metaphorical and the news is just fear mongering. Trump wouldn’t ACTUALLY do what he said he will.
To clarify, this is not an undermining or comparison of both conflicts. This is more so to provide an alongside image to hold news stations accountable for what they determine as “crossing a line”.
https://interactive.aljazeera.com/aje/2024/gaza-before-after-satellite-images/
Chat, is this real?
I don’t know who down voted you, but I hope they educate themselves.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liebeck_v._McDonald's_Restaurants
The plaintiff, Stella Liebeck (1912–2004), a 79-year-old woman, purchased hot coffee from a McDonald’s restaurant, accidentally spilled it in her lap, and suffered third degree burns in her pelvic region. She was hospitalized for eight days while undergoing skin grafting, followed by two years of medical treatment.
The people in prison are not considered humans, remember?
https://www.aclu.org/news/human-rights/captive-labor-exploitation-of-incarcerated-workers
Ah, a troll gotcha. Nowhere did I say China was good. That is just a bad faith take. I was hoping you were actually trying to learn. Don’t bother responding, you are blocked.
Censorship, what does that have to do with the current conversation of the United States attempts at censorship of the Pro-Palestine narrative?
My friend, do you think China does not benefit from the destabilization caused by putting the USA’s blatant support of the ongoing genocide in Gaza on display for all the world to see? Does China have USA’s best interest at heart, no. Is this platform allowing the continued growth of Pro-Palestine support, yes.
The opposite, actually. I do agree that the ban unless sale of tiktok stems from lack of control over the narrative due to the crackdowns we are seeing on college protests.
Only up to 2025?