![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://sh.itjust.works/pictrs/image/045a2049-eb61-4960-88ba-97e7f1ffbf31.jpeg)
I get that but it’s also a genre about social commentary and I think that is best when someone for whom the setting is their home can inject their perspective
I get that but it’s also a genre about social commentary and I think that is best when someone for whom the setting is their home can inject their perspective
Even a contractual ‘Santa clause’ if you will
The problem with that is the rich still get to enjoy it and the rich live in excess. It would make more sense although logistically nonsensical to keep the price the same but only the poorest are allowed access to it
We need to establish community based systems of receiving food and securing shelter before anything like that happens. That shit takes time and most people have to sell that away to make sure they can eat and stay housed as it is
We had a couple election cycles like 20 years ago. As important as damage control is, we’re never voting away corporate profits
I could see a system like that being used to racist ends in America. “Please select from the pre-approved list of biblical names”
We’ve been making things up this whole time. The only reason any of this works is because we all agree it does
LA breathes a sigh of relief at this comment