To me it almost reads as an emphasis for the fuck. Like fUck yes!

Most of the stuff here can be avoided by using quotes for strings…

Yeah but Haskell is mostly used by mathematicians…

People hate hearing that they are bad coders 😂

You and the other guy are saying to focus on writing code with less indentation and using smaller methods, and you both got downvoted.

I fully agree, small methods all the way, and when that’s not possible it’s time to refactor into possibility!

But it’s not a markup language… It’s for data serialisation…

What constitues chemicals for you? I agree with your point- if your dog doesn’t like the treat and you find it tastes unnatural, I agree it’s maybe a bad treat/crappy quality treat.

But “chemical” is not really a descriptor for taste- everything is chemicals. Sugar is a chemical. There are chemicals in natural foods such as meats, veggies, fruits, it’s all chemicals. I think you’re trying to say that the treats taste unnatural or overly processed?

Wow. What makes you say that?

For me it just depends on what I expect. They’re all relatively the same thing. As long as the status code is appropriate (403), it doesn’t matter whether it’s JSON or plaintext. Ideally the API would respect and handle the request header, and return plaintext if you request plaintext.

Yeah, i imagine it really depends on the case and the person.

Yes i saw it too he took it for a month.

I have 3 paths:

• Women are the only person to get on 🤞🏻
• Women are the only one thing you have ever seen this morning but it is the only reason to do the speed limit to be fair but it’s not a lot more to do it and you have a good day on your phone with the kids in a good mood like you have a good time in a lot better today than yesterday and it is so good (keeps looping)
• Women are a bit of a man and I don’t know what to do with the kids and I don’t know what to do with the kids but I don’t know what to do with the kids (keeps looping)

Wait, really? Default iPhone keyboard?

Haha I didn’t get it either

At work, was recently working on a script that alters the repo significantly. Every time I tested the script, I used the up arrow to get the git clean and git checkout HEAD -- files commands to reset the repo. I must’ve used those 100+ times.

I agree with your point, but our algorithms are not deterministic and I doubt they ever will be again. Perhaps they could use a set of tags to create a deterministic result for a certain “genre” of results.

I mean of course that would be nice, but that’s just not realistic. You can’t store that info in a link without it being monstrous.

Why do you say they couldn’t cache the results and instead of re-fetching everything just use the cache results?

They could cache the results you receive on your last visit of the home page which would fix this

Boomeram

This is not the AI result, just an embed from a tiktok post.

This is a different one. The tiktok one is just ripping the text from tiktok, and google has had this feature for yeaaaars. It’s just embedding the content on the page.

The one from the OP is real too and that’s using this feature called “SearchLabs AI” which is written by AI