Sure, but that’s super naive. Holding out against a dem in this election reaffirms the recent defeats or progressives in their primaries. That means the entire US Overton window shifts back further right for a decade
If you are a cop afraid to confront a criminal, isn’t that what special units are for? Like wtf are we giving SWAT teams tanks for if they can’t deal with this?
And 40 years after we bombed our own city, people are still seeking reparations!
This is why I only listen to Tulsi Gabbard! /s
Damn, if only OP had listed some way around the paywall…
More likely the owner knows what the editorial board will do and disagrees with them.
Also, his UBI was essentially a demolition of the welfare state. No conservative actually wants to give you money without strings attached.
Yes, I called him a conservative. Because he is.
I’ve been a poll watcher for every election for almost a decade now (primary and general, every year). The only time I’ve had significant company from either side was 2020
What qualifications does he have to be in any cabinet role?
She certainly captures more liberals and lefties and Trump supporters. That’s why Dems hate her so much
The Russia thing goes beyond the dinner. She had attempted to (maybe actually has?) meet with him privately. She has also vacillated on Ukraine.
She’s had weird stances on vaccines, food (edit: GMOs), and even energy. It’s my understanding she’s privately invested in fossil fuels.
I doubt it, unless for some reason you eat a large quantity of it.
This isn’t payments for votes though
Republicans don’t do that in public
I think the idea from the article was that all the info in the profile had been previously breached and leaked, so anyone could have made the profile
I think the more important question is “why is that relevant?”
I don’t introduce myself with random facts about my past. “Hi, I once kissed a man on a dare”. That’s not relevant.
Nobody has used the word “ban” though
It’s not like the article is a ringing endorsement of the product. I thought the best parts were where it pointed out how bad and overly priced it is
“Lost” seems disingenuous here if we’re talking about casualties. I thought they mean 10,000 died. Ig in the strictest sense of the word they lost then