newsflash its almost literally everyone. The only exception I can possibly think of is Somalia or Algeria, and even then Im not sure.

stand on business

christian lamb is such a good christian name

The spotify of EVs huh

i’m with you it’s really camp

so like, we’re just razing shops of peaceful villages now? Didn’t know we were doing rome roleplay

Okay man. Note that nowhere in the comment chain before you decided to chime in did anyone say conflict. And as far as I know, an attack is an attack and it usually warrants retaliation. But Israel gets unlimited oopsies, lord forbid that Egypt or Lebanon does this, it’s immediately casus belli if the current governments aren’t friendly.

Referencing this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Liberty_incident?wprov=sfti1

deleted by creator

deleted by creator

Point stands - Israel attacking a NATO nation wouldn’t cause american support to waver. Israel serves our colonial interests too much for that.

In the US at least, our policy today doesn’t affect this genocide. Outside of Sudan, the important parties are Egypt, the UAE, and factions in Libya. Whereas in Palestine US missiles and funding to the tune of hundreds of billions of dollars are directly involved, US policy today does not affect Sudan materially.

Still though, the UN and other international organs are documenting and attempting to aid. It’s just not disputed by far right fucks in our government.

well israel has attacked a nato country before to no consequence. The United States.

yeah… it’s not. Having Americans program the training for these models wouldn’t change the fact that the datasets are inherently flawed.

I do. The term صبيّة (sabiyya) is a term for younger girl, sometimes used in the context of slavery or captivity in the past. They’re often said by levantine arabs. The guy in the video said صباية (Sabaya) which is plural for the word, as the israeli soldier girls were young. It’s only sexual if you think that referring to someone as a woman while in captivity necessitates sexual violence.

Some refer to the ISIS use of the term in their official documents. Note that ISIS is bat shit insane, and were condemned by Everyone, including probably hamas (Im not looking this up cause Im probably right).

I dont want to defend hamas but come on man. Israelis love to look for anything that makes them look like irrational animals.

you can be anti hamas without lying too. The problem is that the atlantic is a zionist publication and they grasp at anything to make their case.

Take it from an arabic speaker. Saying this ONE WORD said to SOLDIERS OF AN ENEMY ARMY has sexual connotations is the equivalent of saying the english words “captive” or “prisoner” mean you’re going to rape that person.

Okay Graeme wood of the atlantic. jesus christ I cant believe hasbara got to lemmy

there really isn’t. Learn arabic then come back

okay. so let him joke about american empire.

He’s not wrong is he though? And besides, what is Taiwan besides an American client state?