OP is why we can’t have nice things. Because people will ignore things that should be obvious. So we’re left with everything softball pitched to the lowest common denominator

Many people have given you answers of varying lengfhs, so I feel free to ask my counter-question…

You say you had int() and float() but would do you assume would happen if you had just replaced ‘input(Who are you?)’ with ‘int(7)’? What value would be assigned to name if the statement was ‘nam = int(7)’?

Following the logic you’re espousing in the OP, ‘nam’ would be equal to the string “int(7)” and the print statement would output “Welcome int(7)”. Either you understand why that wouldn’t be the case and should see why your original example works. Or you don’t and you should double check your understanding of functions and keep tapping people here for help.

I’m curious how the sentence “There is every reason for people to believe that” gets translated to “sure, you can think that if you want [to be wrong].”

It reads more like, “I can’t say whether it’s ‘1 plus 3’ or ‘2 plus 2’ but everybody is getting 4.” The evidence is all there.

I figured it was an attempt to get votes in before he’s declared ineligible. So when he’s ousted, he’ll say “I got all these votes, count em! I should win but they’re cheating and saying I can’t run! FRAUD!”

That’s certainly one way to blow someone’s back out

But…that’s not specifically about video games?

E3 cultivated an “insider” appeal that not many large cons tried to match. You could look forward to game reveals that you’d mark on your calendars.

PAX has a more indie feel and Gamescom feels much more like an actual trade show.

Yeah, “urban” is an American dog whistle for “black and/or Hispanic”, e.g. “the young man who rang our doorbell was so urban. i don’t feel very safe.”

As a straight man, the wording in the meme is very literal. I’m not a fan but I’ll allow it.

We’re all on the internet, you can look up the actual definition for “strawman” like I just did.

To paraphrase: strawmanning an argument is not so concretely about “putting words in anyone’s mouth”.

It is the process of debating a newly-created stance/position/idea that is easily disproven and visibly flawed when this new position may or may not be related to anything in the pre-existing debate. You don’t have to be ‘responding to anyone’; in fact, it fits more if you are not arguing something that anyone in the debate has referenced before.

Ah, there we go. I was sure it would be corrupted in some way to be shitty. I was banking on bullshit complaints about the nature of correctness, whenever some idiot failed the test. But buying it out directly is smarter.

There needs to be a “federal tutor” position that collates, issues, and grades tests given to the idiots voting on these laws. If you fail, your vote doesn’t count.

No, a senator shouldn’t have to know differential calculus nor a govenor, endocrinology. But they should be able to source people who can supply them with the right answers.

Because American politics has become so barren of thought and nuance that even interacting with content containing specific images will be highlighted as support for that thing. So you can’t use memes with people you disagree with unless the meme is showing how you want to disrespect them.

And American politics continues to poison the internet “well” like the dead body it is because America has a lot of guns is looking more and more unstable by the day.

Hmmm.

No.

U S A!

U S A!

U S A!!

Honestly, I’m not a doctor or nothing but I’d, personally, have none, if you can help it. YMMV

Maybe that’s a sign to make less coffee, bruv

I can’t believe they just yanked her cakes! What kind of sick world is this?!

‘Apparently’? Are you young, chaste, or just generally uninterested in big boobs?

‘Console exclusivity’ is a tier of exclusivity that’s existed for years already.

I’m tired but what exactly are you not understanding if you’ve parsed the previous two examples of the same joke? Is this some bizarre troll?

“Some shithead is trying to undercut complaints by claiming hypocrisy because the complainer is engaging in or using the thing complained about”?