Glad you got it resolved! (Especially as, while I noted in my earlier reply, I don’t use LaTeX currently, but I’m planning on switching over from asciidoc in the near future for reports and notes and occasionally I do need to write in French!)

On second thought, it looks like it probably isn’t even vimtex or LSP related–probably just your vim settings. Try :set spelllang+=fr

Do you have the language set within the .tex document itself? /selectlanguage{French} Or something like that. You may need to /usepackage{babel} as well or similar. I haven’t played around much with LaTeX, so not sure this will work or not–but everything I’ve seen indicates that the TeX document language setting is what will key the LSP language setting.

I appreciate the author took the time to do this, but I’m a little skeptical of their results. I pay for Kagi, so decided to directly paste their queries into it just to see – while none of the ‘bad’ results would have completely flipped based on the author’s ranking system, the “very bad” would have been just “bad” or possibly “ok”. Adblock showed my uBlock as result number 5; youtube-dl was result number 10, and so on. Mind you, I am running it with uBlock origin and although I haven’t done any custom rankings it is quite possible that some of the other settings (geographic point of origin, for example) would have affected the results. I’m curious to try it with some of the other engines now (as well as a completely blank slate for Kagi) and see – because at least in that instance, I’m not entirely sure these are replicatable results.

Also: a bone to pick with the tire query – the answers the author were scoring higher didn’t answer the question “why do wider tires have better grip” (which is what the author searched), but instead queries which answered “what are the advantages of wider tires”. Not sure it would actually change the proportionate results, but assuming their bullet list is all they were looking for in the answer, it’s hard to criticize any results for not answering the slightly different question than what they posed.

deleted by creator

It takes, what, about five minutes to fuel up a gasoline powered vehicle. Optimistically, in ten years time on a fast charger, 20 minutes for an electric? So theoretically, to maintain the current flow rates on highly trafficked routes (like the 401 from Montreal to Toronto), during peak hours, vehicles need to be stopped at a service station for at least four times as long as they currently are now. It’s also slightly over a 500km long drive, so unless you’re really playing chicken with range you will need to stop at least once (I could be wrong, but I believe most gas powered vehicles can do around 600km range at 120km/h?). I wonder what the land-use requirements will be to charge those vehicles – Walmart parking lots beside the highway may begin to make a killing if they lean into it.

For me, unless my landlord suddenly decides to spend a tonne of money to furnish the first-come, first-serve outdoor parking lot at my building with electric chargers, it’ll be a hybrid after that date (unless I’m rennovicted before then). I wonder if someone is liable for the tripping hazard of extension cords running out the front door and across the sidewalk to street parking.

Obviously I’m being a bit silly and sarcastic here, but the wholly electric by 2035 scheme seems half-baked based on the assumption everyone lives in single family homes and that the amount of intercity travel will decrease in aggregate by then. Rather than say, increasing taxes year on year for gasoline powered ownership and then some heavy investment into things like high speed rail, cycling infrastructure, trams, etc. The solution to cars are too polluting doesn’t have to be the same number or more cars . . .