A decentralized apporch: https://wikipedia.org/wiki/PeerTube

no u

Not quite. Google doesn’t want competition or content creators to be elsewhere.

They want you to pay a higher price but since you have a choice of paying nothing then the message seems clear to me. You can see comedians on there for free, they tell real jokes.

YouTube doesn’t want your money.

That just moves requiring trust from the 1st party to 2nd or 3rd party. Unreasonable trust.

You can’t verify it’s secure if it’s proprietary, so it’s never secure? Having control over other people’s computing creates bad incentives to gain at your user’s expense, so it’s day 1 you should lose trust.

Pick one:

• security
• proprietary OS

It’s worth paying for but not if it includes DRM, proprietary software and preferably not giving money to Don’t Be Evil company.

Under duress I hope.

Do businesses in Turkey not make sure people can do the job (surgery, building design) and rely on this school testing?

What do you mean by tuition, isn’t that a service already paid for?

Is there a reason for the ban related to how the car is built or designed, or is it politics?

What ban?

There are voting systems that completely prevent the need for tactical voting (e.g. instant-runoff voting, aka alternative vote) but if the system still trends towards having two main parties then not much has really changed.

A bigger issue is that a single candidate/party is not very good at representing an area in comparison to having more (3, 5, ideally more). If people vote 80% A and 20% B and A gets the single candidate then 20% are misrepresented. With 5 candidates then that could be split 4 to A and 1 to B, a perfect representation.

Lucky for you I’m not French. I just oppose tactical voting in favor of voting in someone who may have a chance of removing the need for tactical voting.

I don’t know how long it will take and I don’t know which paths actually leads to the least amount of suffered in the short term. I just know it needs to change.

It is my hope that greater political diversity will prevent more suffering in the long run by governments better representing the people.

It’s very comfortable to blame others if your political opponents get into power. If you don’t have another suggestion I can at least leave you with the small comfort that this bad person won’t vote for the main party you dislike the most out of spite.

Voting for a party I don’t want is also suffering, though I doubt you’d believe that. Keeping the main parties in power via a rigged system ain’t ending this catch 22 cycle.

You should be able to vote for both… 😮‍💨

If a party won’t fix the serious issue to let me also vote for who I want, they’re not entitled to my vote.

Open source it so others can continue it if they wanted.