This is what it is called a programming language, it only exists to be able to tell the machine what to do in an unambiguous (in contrast to natural language) way.
This is what it is called a programming language, it only exists to be able to tell the machine what to do in an unambiguous (in contrast to natural language) way.
We should never have allowed a pardon before a conviction. What Ford did for Nixon created all kinds of paradoxes.
We messed up when we allowed Ford’s pardon of Nixon before he was convicted. We should only allow pardons after the person was convicted. That created all kinds of paradoxes:
He was going to face a trial and likely prison, but trump pardoned him and the rest.
Sure, but my point is that if it is implemented right, you won’t even know you’re using IPv6 until you check network configuration.
CAN SOMEONE PLEASE THINK OF THE FELONS?
If IPv6 is done right you don’t even know you have it. If you use a cell phone or a home Internet, there is a high chance you are already using IPv6.
In the first minute of the video he talks about the pool done by Echelon Insights where they actually checked the exact same people.
This one talks about it: https://youtu.be/uMVnhJEDQtg
House arrest is not a penalty that would help him rehabilitate.
He needs an actual jail to learn anything.
At very least he should be doing community service. Maybe picking trash on a highway.
Judges can’t put you in jail if DA doesn’t bring charges and a jury won’t convict.
Canon is trying to do the reverse, using anything she has at her disposal for the trial to not happen as she knows that this case is pretty much an open shut case.
That’s why we have a trial by jury of peers.
An executive branch can issue a pardon, legislative branch can create a law making the crime no longer being a crime and impeach judges.
If those things are not enough, then we have a much more serious problem.
No, that won’t do any rehabilitation. It needs to be jailed or maybe cleaning the highway.
The business records fraud case (“hush money” is misleading what it was) is just the first case that nothing blocked it from proceeding.
Documents case is blocked by Canon, J6 is blocked by SCOTUS, I guess the Georgia case could proceed too, but was maybe more complicated than this one.
It’s not like she is already against prosecution. I don’t believe it could be any more partisan than it already is.
As for delay her last ruling essentially made it indefinite.
As you said, this would require an additional action.
And to me it looks like it can’t be done by EO and would have to be a legislation. And during trump very few legislations got passed even when they had a majority.
The restrictions on sale through Mexico can be implemented when it actually is a problem.
I found an article where they announced a factory in Mexico, but it first have to be built. The news also appears to be before the sanctions were announced. So if that factory was meant for US market this could change their plans, as adding 100% sanctions signals determination to plugin other loopholes.
What’s with that?
I recently read an article that he is allowing to install China’s face tracking cameras in Hungary. I first thought that he was installing it for his own benefit and just got the technology from China, but this actually will be used by China.
While I might grasp his unexplained love for putin, this looks like just selling your country to foreign autocracies.
Trump just confused things (Hailey, Pelosi, Biden, Obama etc). What he means is that he will ban European cars built in Mexico, but allow Tesla produced in China.
I’m half serious, because that’s much more consistent with his policies in 2017-2020
From my experience all the time (probably even more) it saves me is wasted on spotting bugs and the bugs are in very subtle places.