But there is context to it:

The report on Product Security Bad Practices warns software manufacturers about developing “new product lines for use in **service of critical infrastructure or [national critical functions] **NCFs in a memory-unsafe language (eg, C or C++) where there are readily available alternative memory-safe languages that could be used is dangerous and significantly elevates risk to national security, national economic security, and national public health and safety.”

It’s for new products that are very important to critical infrastructure and need to be safe as possible. The article writer seem not to be aware of this context:

Take Rust in Linux, for example. Even with support from Linux’s creator, Linus Torvalds, Rust is moving into Linux at a snail’s pace.

Because Linux is the biggest software in the entire world and they do lot of stuff their own way. Rust is integrated slowly for future new projects. It makes sense to move in snail pace. The government doesn’t suggest the Linux project to stop using C entirely. The government “recommends” to start new projects in memory safe languages, if it is a critical software. That makes sense to me.

You see, people who’ve spent years and sometimes decades mastering C don’t want to master the very different Rust. They don’t see the point.

No, totally wrong. C programmers in Linux do not NEED to learn or master Rust. They just need to cooperate. The problem is, that some C programmers refuse to cooperate with Rust. They just want Rust to disappear. That has nothing to do with mastering the language. They refuse to make changes to their C code, so it can cooperate with Rust code via bindings.

After all, they can write memory-safe code in C, so why can’t you?

Nonsense argument, and false too. If that was the case, why do we have memory safe languages? Clearly people make mistake, old and new. Besides Linux is not the only software in the world.

Converting existing large codebases to memory-safe languages can be an enormous undertaking.

Nobody says old code should be rewritten in Rust. Neither the government, nor the Rust programmers in Linux suggest that. It’s not about rewriting code in memory-safe languages, its about new projects.

Either this article is a misrepresentation or misunderstanding. Or I misunderstand the article or government. I don’t know anymore…

“Taylor Swift Fans Are Leaving Twitter for Bluesky After Trump’s Election”

I’m already trained with over-compliment. I think If I just act like always its already sus. xD

I would just get sunglasses and try to look suspicious just to mess up their tracking.

I thought the contributors list would be reset when uploading to a new location. At least that’s for forks, so that was my assumption without checking actually. I mean for the forks, gdkchan still have the commit history too, like any other contributor.

I think you are right: https://docs.github.com/en/repositories/creating-and-managing-repositories/transferring-a-repository

If the transferred repository has any forks, then those forks will remain associated with the repository after the transfer is complete.

And looking in the list of forks, the oldest one seem to be 1 month old or so.

Understandable. Just to be clear, I wasn’t serious, it is a meme reply. It’s so satisfying if a long awaited game finally comes out. From technical point game seems to be on a good level, without being bug riddled and with good performance. Hopefully it was worth the wait.

Ban real guns, not Fortnite guns.

Half-Life 3 fans: Your first time?

They wouldn’t, even if they knew how. Because unethical makes more money.

After selling user generated content to Ai.

Exactly. That’s what I think too. I also was thinking why is this guy not just using Fediverse. Hopefully that guy discovers it soon, because I’m not against super rich people to invest into this system.

There must be a misunderstanding on the part of the article writer or it is simply an unfortunately constructed sentence. I mean its obvious that Tiktok can’t be purchased in its fullest for just 500m. The budget seems to be the initial money spent to start this project that goes beyond Tiktok. So the way I understand is, he wants to buy Tiktok (maybe other stuff too) and then integrates it into the 500m project.

That’s exactly what a bot would say, to stay undetected.

People learn and write program code with the help of AI. Let this sink in for a moment.

Why? Is it bad providing alternatives? Especially as it is Fediverse based, which is federated and not controlled by a single company. And being compatible to Fediverse protocol means you can use any application.

Imagine something like Amazon, a central place you go and everyone who federates with it can sell products. I’m not against it.

I’m fine with it, if its not invasive in privacy and does not collect all the information. And if its a bit better moderated.

The good thing is, this deal is official. Making it easier to track who uses Ai.

Maybe those comments are still up in Internet Archive.

people often turn to the Reddit hack to make Google results more helpful. By adding "site:reddit.com” to search results

HACKERMAN

deleted by creator