The real story sounds even weirder. They took his work permit for the sole purpose of stopping any integration that could hinder a later deportation. Wtf. Fachkräftemangel my ass.
The real story sounds even weirder. They took his work permit for the sole purpose of stopping any integration that could hinder a later deportation. Wtf. Fachkräftemangel my ass.
What’s your hoster?
Rastafari gehören aber nicht wirklich zum Christentum, da es beim Fundament des Glaubens signifikante Unterschiede gibt. Rastafari glauben an den äthiopischen Kaiser Haile Selassie I. als Reinkarnation Gottes. In dem Sinne sind Rastafari genauso christlich wie Christen jüdisch sind. Die Wurzeln mögen gleich sein, aber sie unterscheiden sich in den zentralen Aspekten der Religion so stark, dass sie letztenendes nicht miteinander vereinbar sind.
That’s the biggest issue of smartwatches IMO. They will all end up in a landfill after approximately 5 years while you’ll be able to give that Timex (or your F91W that costs less than a pizza) to your grandkids.
Als einziger Mensch der existiert sollte ich dringend aufhören mir Leute auszudenken, die davon überzeugt sind, dass sie auch die einzigen Menschen sind. Das wird irgendwann sehr verwirrend.
python -m http.server
came in handy so many times!
Lmao, chinese tea ceremony includes like 500 steps.
Honestly the most complete source of high res music is private trackers like redacted. You can download all the stuff from qobuz and bandcamp, every CD rip you can think of in bit perfect quality of and even very good vinyl rips. You basically can download any version ever released from any album.
Yes, that’s a good alternative for Collection[str]
but not so much for Iterable[str]
as you lose the lazyness of Generators.
Maybe something like passing in a list of patterns which should match some data, or a list of files/urls to download would be examples of where I would like to be generic, but taking in a string would be bad.
But the real solution be to convert it to foo(*args: str)
. But maybe if you take 2 Container[str]
as input so you can’t use . But no real world example comes to mind.
Yes, you’re right. It also a lot of benefits.
This + an assert seems like the way to go. I think that str
should never have fulfilled these contracts in the first place and should have a .chars
property that returns a list of one-character-strings.
But this change would break existing code, so it is not going to happen.
str
matches most of these contracts, though, requiring additional checks if a str
was passed or one of these collections containing strings.
But what if you actually don’t want str
to be valid?
I know that Iterable
and Collection
aren’t the same. My point is, that if you use Iterable[str]
or Collection[str]
as a more flexible alternative to list[str]
you no longer have any type-hinting support protecting against passing in a plain string and you could end up with a subtle bug by unexpectedly looping over ['f', 'o', 'o']
instead of ['foo']
.
Re- not reverse-engineer.
Don’t do this. Running unpatched software is a recipe for disaster.
Banger