Loser intellectual / grifter / “rationalist” / pro-eugenics figure
Loser intellectual / grifter / “rationalist” / pro-eugenics figure
I get what you’re saying, but I still wouldn’t be surprised if Trump was in the book… Sometimes people are dumb and filled with hubris.
We can all agree that Trump was a “customer” (ew) of Epstein though right?
Uh… They’ve definitely assembled more than just one lithography machine. Probably over 80 years ago. Is it just me or is that a weird headline?
Yeah this is a thing. As a poly person myself, some therapists cannot fathom the idea that your poly relationship is even remotely stable, fulfilling, healthy, etc. It’s wild.
It’s okay it’s filled with foot guns.
Men only exist in relation to women. We’re just talking about the reproductive context here, so of course one sex is described in terms of the other. The same holds vice versa, each sex needs the other in an evolutionary system
We are past the point where any of this matters in modern society, and I completely agree with your points about sexism, feminism, etc. I think you’re just letting a scientific/evolutionary perspective and discussion transfer over and project too much onto the problems you see in society today. However, I think (hope) that many of the people in this thread talking about evolution share your thoughts and feelings about modern society, it’s just, we’re talking about a specific, ancient, evolutionary system here is all. It’s very intently sexist I guess if you think about it. We’re lucky to live in modern times.
Sexual selection pressure is massive in evolutionary systems. You’re forgetting that fitness is an indirect result of what is ultimately sexual selection pressure. A lot of people think it’s fitness first, sex second, but it’s actually the other way around, sexual selection plays a larger part, and is supposed to imply fitness, but doesn’t always. Without sex there is no reproduction, and therefore no mutations. Anyways, just remember, in evolutionary systems, they are not directly selecting for traits, they are selecting traits through the abstraction of sex and sexual selection. Sex is king here. IDK it’s weird but it is what it is.
Looks like a conversation between consenting parties
Same. CV1. Fuck Facebook
Bruh relax
What a gross loser…
Same
Idk but they’re funny
It could even be as high as FOUR
Got it. Thank you!
I’ve never understood what [sic] actually means… I am ignorant
This is how I deployed an app less than 5 years ago (healthcare).
It’s sad