• MysticKetchup@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    101
    ·
    5 months ago

    That’s to be expected. What remains to be seen is how many of them will stick around after the initial surge.

      • psud@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        I’m one of those people, definitely not a bot. A friend with several invitations to the beta available offered me one a few days ago and then it was opened so I didn’t need it

  • bort@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    79
    ·
    5 months ago

    oh nice. If this trend continues, they will be by 4 million tommorrow and 20 million next week and by summer every human on earth will have an account.

    • doctortofu@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Same - I was mildly curious to be honest, but not nearly enough to give them my phone number.

      • doctorcrimson@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        I had never even heard of bluesky before and also not really interested. Looks like another Twitter replacement, but I never really got into twitter to start with.

        I saw the title and I was like “1987 blue sky studios is open to the public? The hell does that mean?”

        • unconfirmedsourcesDOTgov@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          5 months ago

          Bluesky is supposed to be Twitter 2.0 - Jack Dorsey, who co-founded Twitter, is on the board for Bluesky and was supposedly very involved in building the platform. So in theory it could be a lot of things that Twitter wished it could, or it could just be bad like most other socials.

          Either way if you have an interest in the tech world it’s probably worth keeping an eye on.

  • newproph@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    whoever made that graph needs to learn how to properly space their horizontal axis labels

  • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    How quickly will it become a serious contender against Twitter?

    I’ll stick with lemmy, but I’d love to bathe in some schadenfreude at musks expense.

    • psud@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      Someone is already sitting on the rocketlab name. I’m only on X for space launch tweets, and was hoping some of them were posting on both X and Bsky

  • Breve@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    While some may see this as good for Bluesky, I bet this is the floodgates opening to bots and algorithmically boosted harmful content. Good luck everyone on there!

    • H_Interlinked@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 months ago

      Threads default settings are like an open fire hose of rage bait and negativity spraying directly into your face. It’s pretty wild without some manual feed pruning.

      • Breve@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        I’ve been using Mastodon and it’s a pleasant change of pace. I’ve heard of some spam happening there but I think responsive admins and the lack of algorithmic feeds really reduces their reach.

    • Natanael@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 months ago

      All the algorithms on bluesky are optional, there’s both official feeds and a lot of 3rd party feeds (and they don’t run on view counts!), so there’s no trivial way to game the algorithms to reach the userbase

      • Breve@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Fair, though this is also where the double-edge sword of discoverability steps in too. Many people complain about the lack of it on decentralized systems, but centralized systems have a nice catalog of users for bots to message with little effort.

        I’ll admit that lack of discoverability isn’t a perfect solution since there are other ways for spammers to discover users. E-mail is a great example of a large, long running, decentralized system that has increasingly suffered from spam since its inception due to mass data collection of addresses. However if you’re really careful about who you share your address with, it’s possible to still avoid most of it. I give out unique e-mail address to companies and spam tends to only come in on a few, often because they were breached or are otherwise “leaky” about their user’s data. Dropbox is by far the worst offender.

    • psud@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 months ago

      You need to register with a phone number, and they send a verification SMS to the number which you must complete to finish registration

      I think that’s difficult for bulk bots

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 months ago

        Nah it just means you need to contract with a temp sms number provider. It’ll be difficult for your average kid in a garage to run bulk bots but not for state, corporate, and other well funded actors.

        • Breve@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          5 months ago

          I’ve seen pictures of rooms with walls full of Android cell phones on shelves all hooked up by USB for power and remote control. They can load apps, register accounts, and interact with content inside the app while appearing as legitimate mobile users. That’s why moves like Reddit restricting API access only hurt legitimate users and lazy bot farms, cause the hardcore bot farms have been using the official app on real phones all along.

    • psychothumbs@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      That’s the beauty of it already being a thriving forum before opening up to the public, there’s a lot of ongoing content beyond people logging on and saying hi for the first time.

    • psychothumbs@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      What is bluesky? Basically a twitter clone that was spun off as it’s own thing by the twitter team that was working on federation when Musk took over. It’s pretty good if you liked the pre-Musk twitter vibe or a slightly smaller scale and leftier version of it.

      https://bsky.app/

  • Chessmasterrex@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Ah yes another commercial social media platform taking the first steps in the enshitification process. We’ve seen this all before in the early days of other platforms before the decay sets in.

  • PatFusty@lemm.ee
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    They have more posts than lemmy has active users. Nice

  • Heresy_generator@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    5 months ago

    I don’t understand the categories’ purpose here. Can’t someone be all three? Or are they presented as a hierarchy, like “likers” have liked but not followed or posted, “followers” have followed someone but not posted, while “posters” have posted?

    • fr0g@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      5 months ago

      I’m curious what lesson learned from twitter easily also applies to bluesky, as that’s genuinely not very clear to me.

      • smileyhead@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        That going into corporate, VC funded, centralization focused and privately controlled social network is not good long-term idea.

        Myself I have nothing against profit itself, but the relationship of how single entity can manage network.

        • fr0g@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          5 months ago

          But they’re (allegedly soon) federated and say they want to give control of the protocol over to an independent standards body. So like, half of the stuff you’re saying might not even really apply here.

          • smileyhead@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            5 months ago

            It’s the mindset. Standard bodies already have plenty of protocols established, with ActivityPub being the latest trend implemented in dozens of different federated apps. XMPP for real time data flow or (not yet standardized) Matrix for shared graph databases. Bluesky is another XKCD 927.

            I won’t expect anything great from a social service from the start hosted on Amazon AWS, with domain bought from Google Domains, developed on Microsoft GitHub, announcing app first on Apple AppStore and not supporting basic decentralization-friendly things like IPv6.

            • fr0g@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              5 months ago

              Not inherently. But since both Mastodon and Bluesky use some sort of public protocol, it is possible that people will develop some bridging software that allows both protocols to talk to each other. I think some people are already trying to build something like that, but I have no idea how well it will work/what the trade-offs will be. Maybe not every feature can be easily translated between the protocols.