• HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    53
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    7 months ago

    Based on what I’ve seen on the public facing part of the developer side, I get the feeling this isn’t the kind of group that can build the kind of organization required to make this sustainable in the long run.

    I’m just waiting for when Beehaw releases that they’ve given up on Lemmy and have created a new tech stack.

    • Serinus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      55
      ·
      7 months ago

      It’s open source. We don’t have to depend on the original developers.

      If it gets too bad, someone can just make a fork.

      Afaik people are just impatient with the developers and have different short term goals.

      • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        I mention a new tech stack because Beehaw brought it up as an option and a lot of people have commented on the difficulty of development in this environment.

          • Rob T Firefly@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            37
            ·
            7 months ago

            Rust seems like a great foundation.

            The fact that I know you’re referring to the programming language called “Rust” doesn’t make this sentence any less funny.

          • Kogasa@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            13
            ·
            7 months ago

            It could still be rust. Code is always the easy part. Design and organization and funding are hard

    • Ategon@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      In terms of new tech stack currently theres sublinks being made by devs/admins of a bunch of instances (discuss.online, lemmy.world, programming.dev, etc.)