• mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    dunno how you mandate people vote. the rest looks like an ambitious but overall laudable start.

    • 3volver@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      A benefit rather than a detriment. Have a benefit offered only to those who have voted in the past election. It could be even paired with the universal basic income, an extra $100 added to your monthly UBI if you are a registered voter who has voted in the most recent election. With universal vote by mail, election day being a holiday, and plenty of early voting days leading up to the election there would be no excuse to not vote.

      • pivot_root@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        I’m not sure it would be a good idea, even if it’s a benefit instead of a detriment.

        Ignorant or apathetic voters with no stake in or care for politics will just vote to obtain benefits without doing any research beforehand. That leads to them either voting for the first person on the ballot or the name they hear the most.

        A fewer number of informed voters would be more likely to lead to progressive changes, in my opinion. Uninformed throw-away voters adds noise and introduces a demographic that can be influenced by candidate popularity rather than their policies.

    • Doombot1@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      Somehow the IRS knows to come after everyone for taxes - they don’t typically miss people. So maybe something somehow like that?

      Additionally, no ID renewal without proof of having voted/a valid exception (e.g. out of country)