I recently saw ‘Don’t Look Now’ (1973). Good picture, a little slow perhaps by today’s standards but worthy of any movie enjoyer’s time! So this movie was shot in Venice. Venice itself being an already beautiful spot to film even today. The way we get to look in a time capsule of Venice in the 70s makes the movie that much better!

People in the 70s could not in fact appreciate it the same way we do now. Concurrently we also can’t do it for today’s movies. Some movies can only be truly appreciated over time is what I believe. This matter can be expressed in both the movie’s message or, as I did, its cinematography. Hence my question now to you.

  • Yrt@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    6 months ago

    I saw Alien 1 just a couple of weeks ago for the first time and I was amazed how good it still looked. The design of the spaceship and the alien itself still looked amazing in 4k on an OLED TV. And also the story still seemed like a fresh idea. Of course there are moments with stupid acting people, but all in all the decisions made felt plausible and logical, not the normal stupid horror movie group. And also the story twist came (for me) as a real surprise and not like a thing you knew after the first 5min. (And I’m also surprised that after all these years it’s still a surprise, cause everybody knows the alien but not the story of the first movie?)

  • stanleytweedle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Nearly everything Terry Gilliam made has aged very well for me. He creates strange and interesting visual worlds that never really seem dated because they all sort of exist in their own time-space.

    Also anything Jim Henson company touches seems to become immortal. Dark Crystal and Labyrinth are masterpieces.

    And to a lesser degree Don Coscarelli has made some pretty timeless films. Beastmaster is still very watchable.

    • Onions Sliced Thin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Gah! Now I need to go watch Dark Crystal again. That’s such a good movie, and I recently watched Labyrinth. I’ll cue it up, and then stick Brazil right behind.

  • usualsuspect191@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    The Matrix Still looks great and works as a trans allegory

    Gattaca Getting more prescient with each year

    • xkforce@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 months ago

      That movie pissed my ex off. 23 minutes before there was any dialogue. Should have known then and there the relationship was doomed.

    • demesisx@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Little known fact: the visual effects look so good because they shot the mattes and all elements ON THE SAME PIECE OF FILM. They’d shoot the matte, put the film in storage, build the set, then shoot the scene on top of that.

  • BowserBasher@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    Jurassic Park. Those dinos beat many of today’s CGI films. Mixed in with the animatronic ones they just blend in so well. The story is simple (to quote Dr Malcolm) God creates dinosaurs. God destroys dinosaurs. God creates man. Man destroys God. Man creates dinosaurs. There are so many quotable lines, as shown just now, and the music is pretty unforgettable too.

    • forgotaboutlaye@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      I would say a lot of Spielberg’s work. It just doesn’t seem to age. I watched Munich a few weeks ago, and to me it could have come out yesterday. Same for Saving Private Ryan or Schindler’s List.

    • hactar42@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      IMO, the early 90s was a golden age for movie effects. There was CGI but it was so primitive and expensive it was used sparingly. Like you mentioned that blend of practical and special effects was amazing.

      Another great example of this is Terminator 2. They obviously used CGI for the T-1000 but then they actually flew a helicopter under a highway overpass, drove a semi-truck off a bridge into the LA river, and blew up an office building.

    • Chee_Koala@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      6 months ago

      I Showed the Goonies to a couple of young teens in my fam and they thought it was boring and weird… :( . Sucks to be them, missing out on this gem of a movie!

        • Chee_Koala@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          Excellent point! A new fam batch is brewing ages 2-4 right now, i’ll try again in a year or 6 😊

  • ace_garp@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    6 months ago

    The original Blade Runner(1982)

    That sparse and bleak mood will never age. Poses excellent dilemas and moral questions about cyborgs too.

    Also Citizen Kane. I watched it a couple of years ago because of it’s position in film history. Yes, it is that good of a masterpiece.

  • somnuz@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    6 months ago

    Bunny Lake Is Missing (1965) — hard to say anything without spoiling the plot

    Blair Witch Project (1999) — I just admire how great idea / concept extended beyond the movie itself. No-one can ever watch it again for a first time during ‘99 but it is iconic and great as a case study of having almost no budget and making something really impactful / special

    Her (2013) — this one is my answer for the same question but asked in 2061…

    • Boozilla@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 months ago

      Appreciate the love for BWP. I really enjoyed it when it came out. My friends/family all made fun of me, parroting the usual criticisms.

      • somnuz@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 months ago

        Oh! I didn’t see it when it came out. I saw it around 2002 — and let’s just underline one thing here, some people in my family can really pull proper pranks. With this movie (all this is not happening in the US) my cousin made the whole introduction for me and others “this movie is not actually a movie, it was not played in many cinemas, it was banned almost instantly, you can not buy it or rent it, I ordered this tape via a magazine about unresolved police investigations from around the world and this is just a montage of what was found there… I saw it only once, it is pretty disturbing, weird. I don’t believe in anything supernatural but fuck, this movie makes me question some things now…” — like… come on! I heard and read so many different versions of this story from others and their experiences almost always boiled down to the same conclusion for me, the movie was just a possibility to make everything around the movie so much more impactful than the movie in itself, urban legend for creating more urban legends. Next level sneaky move. On the other hand, “Yeah I saw it, it’s all fake and made up, someone explained to me how it’s all a hoax, really nothing special, stupid, boring and not scary at all” — how circumstances can change everything.

        The other, similar one was during “The Ring” where my uncle was calling from his cellphone on their home landline every time the phone rang in the movie. They were so boggled about it to the point where they were rewinding the movie to test it… They didn’t finish it. One of family legends was born on that night…

  • chbarts@mastodon.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    6 months ago

    @FatTony

    Citizen Kane is still a wonderful film with well-drawn characters, great cinematography, and a relevant message: If you have a hole in your psyche, wealth alone won’t fill it.