• Pronell@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    91
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    He was an antivax conspiracy theorist who was convinced there was no Trump/Russia connection.

    • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      3 months ago

      NPR definitely has shifted left over the years. Reading his release, he had me with the first part. Then he goes and jumps the rails to Madeupville, Crazytown.

      • Pronell@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        3 months ago

        I listened to NPR the other day. They read off research by The Heritage Foundation with no analysis at all and then thanked them at the end.

        NPR aims to be middle of the road but doesn’t mind that it’s in the ditch.

      • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        They haven’t shifted anywhere. Being “left” these days means not being an insurrectionist… it’s the conservatives who’ve moved further right; and in any case, NPR as a whole is very accurate on their reporting.

        • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          3 months ago

          It’s that mentality that further perpetuates extremes.

          I’m not at all accusing them of compromised reporting. They’re well known for being factual, and one of my long-term favorite sources. Once they commit to a piece, they usually leave me with no questions. They just tend to spend more time focusing on the left than the right.

      • stoly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Reality has a leftist bias. You think they have gone left only because a lot of very stupid and insecure people have shifted harshly to the right.

  • JaymesRS@literature.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    What’s the over/under on the timeline for transition to right-wing “I used to be a liberal” grifter? Do we count when he invites people people to subscribe to his new “actual freedom of speech no cancel culture here” Substack even if there’s no posts?

  • jballs@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    3 months ago

    Interesting that he says:

    Back in 2011, although NPR’s audience tilted a bit to the left, it still bore a resemblance to America at large. Twenty-six percent of listeners described themselves as conservative, 23 percent as middle of the road, and 37 percent as liberal.

    By 2023, the picture was completely different: only 11 percent described themselves as very or somewhat conservative, 21 percent as middle of the road, and 67 percent of listeners said they were very or somewhat liberal. We weren’t just losing conservatives; we were also losing moderates and traditional liberals.

    And then blames this on NPR. The GOP has been labeling NPR and other legitimate news sources as “fake news” and corrupt for years now. They are constantly pushing their constituents to only get their news from the right-wing bubble where they can control the message.

    It’s no wonder that conservatives aren’t listening to NPR. But that is not NPR’s fault nor should NPR change their reporting as a result. Their job is to report fair and unbiased news. If a group of the population doesn’t want fair and unbaised news, they shouldn’t start spewing bullshit just to appease these people.

    • ZK686@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      3 months ago

      Bullshit. NPR put themselves in this situation and lost conservative listeners because they no longer cared to report news that the Right would care about. And that, starts at the top from people who want to push a certain narrative. I listen to a ton of radio news stations on my Sirius XM every day (I drive a lot for work) and they constantly attacked the Right, ONLY have liberal guests on, and ONLY reported news from a liberal position. And this has been going on for years. Every single political news that came out of NPR was how the Left was great, and the Right was killing America. It’s been the same liberal, leftist bullshit for years now. THAT’S why they started losing conservatives.

          • rbesfe@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            When someone complains about a news organization having a left wing bias, it’s important to remind them that objective reporting will always look like a left wing bias

        • ZK686@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Reality also has a ton of issues that are a direct result of liberalism/left-wing policies too…issues that most news outlets don’t like to report on, which is why NPR is in this situation.

      • Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        I remember when GOP wasn’t anti-science.

        Hard to have a conversation with a guest when one side has PhDs and research papers and another side has a graph from a offbeat website and is “just asking questions”.

      • tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Spaceballs said evil will always triumph because good is dumb. But turns out if you need to play dumb to funnel money to the rich, eventually you’re gonna attract real dumb to your side. These days gop voters can’t stand the truth. Every single part of the party is based on a lie and the only people willing to support it are people without morals or complete idiots.

        News outlets shouldn’t platform liars. If that loses right wing listeners boo fucking hoo-- they already live in fantasy land.

        • ZK686@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Let me guess, news outlets that are Left Wing are al 100% honest? I mean, that’s bullshit and you know it. There’s crazy things going on, on both sides of the political spectrum. A news outlet’s job is to inform and report these things, no matter what side of the politics they are. Just because you hate Fox and it’s listeners, doesn’t mean that stuff isn’t actually happening. The problem is a lot of these news outlets don’t want to report anything that make Democrats/Liberals look bad…

  • VonCesaw@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    3 months ago

    I mean, if by “liberal bias” they mean “they want NPR to continue” I guess it’s technically true, the same way that “Public Broadcasting should continue” also counts as “liberal bias”

    I’m like 90% sure I remember Mr. Rogers testifying before Congress to keep PBS a thing, which was met with vitriol by right-wingers

    • stoly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      You’re mixing two events:

      1. Rogers went in front of the Senate and managed to convince an angry senator to support the creation of PBS. He was probably all of 25 years old when he did this and the senator went from hard and angry to soft and open-minded.
      2. Fox News at some point over Lockdown called him an evil man for suggesting that people deserve to be treated well.
  • stoly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    3 months ago

    The only complaint I have about NPR is that they went heavily with a pro-Israel posture after the October events. It took them months to catch up to reality and stop it.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    Uri Berliner, a senior editor at NPR who penned an op-ed last week accusing the broadcaster of liberal bias, has resigned from the company.

    “But I cannot work in a newsroom where I am disparaged by a new CEO whose divisive views confirm the very problems at NPR I cite in my Free Press essay.”

    In his essay, Berliner writes NPR had strayed too far left politically and was increasingly only presenting “the distilled worldview of a very small segment of the U.S. population.”

    The episode has provided fodder for Republicans and conservative critics of the network, who have long alleged bias against them at the public broadcaster.

    Some conservative activists have highlighted social media posts from Katherine Maher, NPR’s CEO, before she took over at the company this year espousing progressive ideas.

    In a statement to The Hill on Tuesday in regard to Berliner’s reported suspension, NPR said it “does not comment on individual personnel matters, including discipline.”


    The original article contains 272 words, the summary contains 159 words. Saved 42%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • ZK686@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    3 months ago

    No news is neutral anymore. However, I will say that 80% of all news outlets and entertainment shows are Left leaning. There’s only a couple of Right leaning networks still alive… for every 1 Right Wing network, there’s a dozen Left Wing networks…this is why so many on the Right get their news from Fox, because there’s nothing else really out there that addresses issues that Conservatives/Republicans care about.