• dudinax@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    5 months ago

    Remember when Trump disrupted another prosecution because some of the prosecutors had sex? Expect a full-bore media frenzy over this.

    • aStonedSanta@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      Yeah. That was fucking stupid on their part. One of the only times I kinda agreed with trumps incessant bitching and complaining. I hate that I feel that way lol

        • toiletobserver@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          People who are intimately involved have a tendency to make compromised decisions involving the other person. It isn’t just about doing the right thing, it is about looking like you are doing the right thing too.

          • dudinax@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            Even if they don’t have sex, people who work closely together inevitably become intimate.

            Judgement can be clouded for all kinds of reasons. That’s also unavoidable in any complex undertaking without rising to the level of malfeasance or negligence.

              • dudinax@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                5 months ago

                They stopped having sex before the indictment. What’s idiotic is people thinking that two people who ever had sex before shouldn’t work together.

        • aStonedSanta@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          It clouds the judgment of their character. That gives trump an opening… aka dumb AF on their part.