NetBSD Foundation 🚩 (@netbsd@mastodon.sdf.org)
mastodon.sdf.org
New development policy: code generated by a large language model or similar technology (e.g. ChatGPT, GitHub Copilot) is presumed to be tainted (i.e. of unclear copyright, not fitting NetBSD's licensing goals) and cannot be committed to NetBSD. https://www.NetBSD.org/developers/commit-guidelines.html

New development policy: code generated by a large language model or similar technology (e.g. ChatGPT, GitHub Copilot) is presumed to be tainted (i.e. of unclear copyright, not fitting NetBSD’s licensing goals) and cannot be committed to NetBSD.

https://www.NetBSD.org/developers/commit-guidelines.html

  • Zos_Kia@lemmynsfw.comEnglish
    256·
    5 months ago

    I’m saddened to use this phrase but it is literally virtue signalling. They have no way of knowing lmao

    • best_username_ever@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
      3·
      5 months ago

      It’s actually simple to detect: if the code sucks or is written by a bad programmer, and the docstrings are perfect, it’s AI. I’ve seen this more than once and it never fails.

      • TimeSquirrel@kbin.social
        1·
        5 months ago

        So your results are biased, because you’re not going to see the decent programmers who are just using it to take mundane tasks off their back (like generating boilerplate functions) while staying in control of the logic. You’re only ever going to catch the noobs trying to cheat without fully understanding what it is they’re doing.

        • best_username_ever@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
          1·
          5 months ago

          You’re only ever going to catch the noobs.

          That’s the fucking point. Juniors must learn, not copy paste random stuff. I don’t care what seniors do.