The Biden administration is canceling student loans for another 160,000 borrowers through a combination of existing programs.

The Education Department announced the latest round of cancellation on Wednesday, saying it will erase $7.7 billion in federal student loans. With the latest action, the administration said it has canceled $167 billion in student debt for nearly 5 million Americans through several programs.

The latest relief will go to borrowers in three categories who hit certain milestones that make them eligible for cancellation. It will go to 54,000 borrowers who are enrolled in Biden’s new income-driven repayment plan, along with 39,000 enrolled in earlier income-driven plans, and about 67,000 who are eligible through the Public Service Loan Forgiveness program.

    • Aux@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      One small good deed doesn’t not redeem that little fucker from genocide support.

      • Lets_Eat_Grandma@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Which democrat or republican with significant support from the political parties would you recommend as a replacement?

  • gastationsushi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    The problem with this debt forgiveness by a thousand cuts is spending hours researching it then finding out you arbitrarily don’t qualify because some highly technical reason.

    This technocrated BS isn’t helping any but the lucky few that end up qualifying.

      • gastationsushi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Do you want debt reform or not?

        Congress empowered the president to forgive debt. The courts ignored standing rules to even take that case and SCOTUS has no power to overrule both congress and the president.

        President’s have ignored SCOTUS before but Biden doesn’t even have to do that. He can forgive debt like he’s doing now but do it broadly and instantaneously.

        If SCOTUS later rules against that broad forgiveness, there’s nothing administratively they can do. No politician D or R would reinstate $.5 trillion in voter debt just to appease the unelected SCOTUS. You can’t put that genie back in the bottle.

        • HubertManne@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          you realize what your saying is a longer form of what I was right? because your initial question makes it sound like I was saying he should not be doing what I pointed out rather than me pointing out he is doing what he can.

          • gastationsushi@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            If you believe forgiving the debt 100k students here and there is reform, then we are in disagreement.

            I think over 100 million student debt holders will need some type of debt forgiveness to actually reform things. That why I push for broad forgiveness.

            And yes Biden can! It’s his administration and admins forgive debt all the time. We are so many liberals in this thread defending SCOTUS?

            • HubertManne@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              he can’t because he tried and got it blocked so he is working at it as he can based on the ruling. When a ruling like this is made you have to dissect it and see what you can work around that is specified in the ruling. that is what he is doing.

              • gastationsushi@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 month ago

                What are you saying? Biden himself says the ruling is wrong and will do any means possible to forgive student debt. He’s doing that on a minor scale, he can by his own account, do it at a larger scale.

                • HubertManne@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  you make no sense. just because he thinks a ruling is wrong does not mean he does not need to abide by it and he is using any means possible within the law and certainly he meant legally. We know the man that well enough.

  • lightnegative@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Sad for those who worked hard and repaid their loans and now get to watch as everyone else gets theirs written off

    • dan@upvote.au
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Bad take. Just because one group of people had to go through some pain, doesn’t mean other groups should have to go through the same pain.

      A long term strategy would still be better, but for now, this is a good move.

  • NoSuchAgency@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Awesome, so everyone who couldn’t afford to go to college now has to pay for the people who went to college making more money than the person paying off their debt. Yeah, that seems legit.

    • Beetlejuice001@lemmy.wtf
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Did you hear how much was spent on the Iraq war? Maybe the 2008 debt crises? Maybe the PPP loan forgiveness? Surely you’ve heard of one that dwarfed those in comparison. Obvious troll is obvious

      • NoSuchAgency@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        Yeah, so what that there’s been more money spent on other things. That has nothing to do with this. Why does that make it okay to take money from people who couldn’t afford to go to college and give it to people that went to college that have a higher income than the person they took it from?

        • Beetlejuice001@lemmy.wtf
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          You’re right , Its almost as if college should be free, along with healthcare and many others. Perhaps the rich should pay for it similar to other first world countries.

          • NoSuchAgency@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            I don’t see why colleges aren’t forced to lower their tuition costs. They already get billions in taxpayer money every year. Imo, to take even more taxpayer money to pay off student loans is just theft.

  • mydude@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    JOE BIDEN PLAYED a central role in the creation of the student debt crisis…

    https://theintercept.com/2020/01/07/joe-biden-student-loans/

    Edit, here is some more information if you would like to see more concrete examples:

    https://bigthink.com/the-present/joe-biden-student-debt/

    In 1978 he co-wrote a bill that introduced the first limit on how students could use bankruptcy law to reduce their debt burden.

    In 1990 he helped author the Crime Control Act, which is famous for stepping up sentencing guidelines, included an entirely unrelated clause that further lengthened the time students had to wait before they could declare bankruptcy on their student loans.

    In 1998 they introduced an “undue hardship” clause to federal student loan bankruptcy proceedings; making it even more difficult to declare bankruptcy on student debt.

    To top all of this off, he supported adding the undue hardship clause to private student loans in 2005.

      • mydude@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        https://bigthink.com/the-present/joe-biden-student-debt/

        In 1978 he co-wrote a bill that introduced the first limit on how students could use bankruptcy law to reduce their debt burden.

        In 1990 he helped author the Crime Control Act, which is famous for stepping up sentencing guidelines, included an entirely unrelated clause that further lengthened the time students had to wait before they could declare bankruptcy on their student loans.

        In 1998 they introduced an “undue hardship” clause to federal student loan bankruptcy proceedings; making it even more difficult to declare bankruptcy on student debt.

        To top all of this off, he supported adding the undue hardship clause to private student loans in 2005.

        • evatronic@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          And now, he’s changed his stance in response to a changing society and pressure from voters.

          Isn’t that a good thing? Don’t we want politicians who are demonstrably responsive to voters?

          • Krono@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            He hasn’t changed his stance, hes doing the bare minimum to garner positive headlines in an election year.

            He needs to actually change stances if he wants to prevent another Trump presidency.

        • hydrospanner@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Thank you for sharing all this.

          While I’m under no illusions that Biden is my friend, in the current political climate, I can’t shake the feeling that he’s my friendliest enemy.

          Can you shed any more light on that 1990 business?

          While I have no familiarity with it, the circumstances suggest that it’s possible that the added clause was added as a bit of trade-off to other members of Congress to get the crime bill over the finish line. Not that that makes it any less bitter a pill for borrowers, but if that’s how it happened, that’s much less “Biden hates borrowers” and much more the political game in DC.

          • mydude@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            It’s not that Biden hates borrowers or students. The problem is, that even way back then, he owed too much favours, so he drafted legislation that “the big guys” (his quote) wanted.

            Results from Cca 1990 being easier to criminalize young people, and young people with records could not wipe debt/much harder to do. (if I understood it correctly).

    • Franklin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Imagine if someone took every mistake you ever made and magnified it as if you weren’t allowed to grow or change.

      That’s you, that’s what you sound like

      • mydude@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        These are the things that he’s proud of. He’s not ashamed of these policies. Not one bit.

        https://bigthink.com/the-present/joe-biden-student-debt/

        In 1978 he co-wrote a bill that introduced the first limit on how students could use bankruptcy law to reduce their debt burden.

        In 1990 he helped author the Crime Control Act, which is famous for stepping up sentencing guidelines, included an entirely unrelated clause that further lengthened the time students had to wait before they could declare bankruptcy on their student loans.

        In 1998 they introduced an “undue hardship” clause to federal student loan bankruptcy proceedings; making it even more difficult to declare bankruptcy on student debt.

        To top all of this off, he supported adding the undue hardship clause to private student loans in 2005.

        • AA5B@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          1978 is reaching way back. Were you even alive then? Do you know what our society was like, what the options were? Have you changed at all over the last 46 years?

            • AA5B@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              In 1978 I stole a free battery from Radio Shack. Does that make me a lifelong thief?

              • mydude@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 month ago

                He stole the battery in 1978, 1990, 1998 , 2005. If you can’t see the pattern, then I can’t help you.