Tack “&udm=14” on to the end of a normal search, and you’ll be booted into the clean 10 blue links interface. While Google might not let you set this as a default, if you have a way to automatically edit the Google search URL, you can create your own defaults.

  • Grangle1@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    This won’t last long. It’s too public now. Google will find a way to kill it and force their AI on you as much as possible.

    • ahal@lemmy.ca
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      Google’s too smart for that. They know there’s a big backlash against AI in the tech savvy crowd and that it’s bleeding users to competitors. So they offer this escape valve that they know the techies will easily find and use, but which 99% of the population will never even look for. This way they can still push AI on almost everyone while at the same time retain as many disgruntled techies as they can.

      • laurelraven@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        You’re giving them a lot more credit than is probably warranted. They’ve killed off so many popular things and workarounds that really cost them nothing to leave available for the tech savvy they’ve very much shut down to force people to use the systems they want to push.

        googie hasn’t been tech savvy friendly for a while now

        • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Ok. But what benefit would they gain by forcing people into AI search? That’s not rhetorical, I’m legitimately asking. Are you saying this is just about controlling the experience? Because they already did, and all this is doing is weakening that control. It’s certainly not easier or more cost-effective. They’ll get LLM training data from either interface. The other things they shut down cost them development or maintenance or even just server space, but even if they managed 100% adoption of AI search they’ll still need to maintain their old platform as a data source for the AI and for the below-page results. So what financial incentive do they have to push people to a more expensive, less-liked endpoint for that data?

          • laurelraven@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            I’ve given up trying to understand what benefit companies like googie get from most of the shitty consumer-hostile decisions they make. You’ll have to ask them when they inevitably shut that down what they get from doing that.

      • wagoner@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Google kills its golden goose search engine and is thought here up be too smart to disable a workaround… I’m doubtful.

        • Halcyon@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          But it’s not a workaround. This Web-Filter is a function that Google offers by choice. It’s in the menu on the search page.

    • Halcyon@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      Why should they? The Web-Filter is a function that Google implemented themselves. It’s not a secret trick or something.