I hope it’s better than Civ 6.

  • brenticus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    25 days ago

    My prediction is that people will overhype it with lots of hopes for super complex systems, call it shit when it has fewer mechanics and civs than 3/4/5/6 with all their DLC, and then eventually decide it’s good after a couple years of DLC and patches.

    You know, the usual Civ cycle. I’ll probably buy it day 1 assuming it isn’t actually broken, per usual, and dump a couple hundred hours in it, per usual.

    • Atomic@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      25 days ago

      I just want an AI that actually plays the game and have to build things for real instead of cheating in everything.

      • Ashtear@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        25 days ago

        The AI has never been great in the series for various reasons, but for whatever reason it just did not know how to play in Civ6. I’d either get crushed by the bonuses early on if I played on high difficulty or have the game firmly in hand by the Renaissance otherwise. Easily the worst game in the series for me as a result.

        • Phoonzang@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          25 days ago

          Yeah, it seems at a certain breaking point in the difficulty curve it becomes “catch up with the AI boni”, which made it a completely different game for me. And as you said, usually by renaissance you know if this is going to be a landslide victory (which at that point becomes a chore), or if you’re screwed.

      • thejoker954@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        23 days ago

        This please.

        Yes pretty graphics are nice, but I have never understood why it seems like all effort to make better game ‘AI’ just completely stopped.

        Like I get getting game ai to act ‘real’ is/was virtually impossible, but it’s possible to fake it enough to make it enjoyable and has been for a long while and yet is always an afterthought.

  • Nighed@sffa.community
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    25 days ago

    I just hope (foolishly) that with the current hype that it’s AI will be a focus. I hate that because it cheats things that would work on me don’t work on the AI etc.

    It would be really cool if they made an API for the game so people could build their own AI

    • Coelacanth@feddit.nu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      24 days ago

      That really is one of the biggest flaws of Civ. It’s so hard to find a breakpoint where the gameplay “feels good” but still is challenging. If you’re at a difficulty level where the gameplay is mostly intact, the AI is just too dumb, and if you bump it up it becomes a meta game of playing around the AI bonuses.

      • chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        24 days ago

        This was covered in a great talk by Soren Johnson (lead designer of Civ IV): Playing to Lose: AI and Civilization.

        His main thesis is that players constantly demand stronger AI (that doesn’t cheat) but when they try it they hate it. The issue is that strong AI doesn’t role-play like an actual historical leader, it plays like a “gamer” who will stop at nothing to win.

        That is, strong AI opponents treat Civ like a game of poker and they’ll use every possible means of defeating you. They’re not reliable allies or trading partners, they’re bluffing, duplicitous liars.

        Human players who play against such AIs report a very negative experience. Many of the diplomacy functions in the game become rather useless against such an untrustworthy AI, and the whole situation devolves into something more akin to “turn-based Warcraft” rather than Civilization.

  • kinther@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    24 days ago

    I played Civilization for years. When Civ 5 came out, I was incredibly psyched. I specifically went to PAX one year just so I could get new information on the game. When I finally played it, it was the biggest disappointment of my gaming life. It just doesn’t feel like any of the previous ones. Civ 6 is way better in almost every way.

    I’m wary of Civ 7 though. How can they improve upon the game without adding minigames or breaking it into insane amounts of DLC eg. Stellaris? I probably won’t pick it up until it’s on a steam sale with all its DLC at 50% off or something stupid.

    • djsaskdja@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      25 days ago

      I’m glad they moved away from unit death stacks in 5 and 6. I think 5 has the best art direction, but 6 is peak gameplay for me.