• FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    57 major accidents-

    It should be said that most of our accidents don’t result in Chernobyl like death tolls, but then, Chernobyl is in a class all its own.

    As bad as TMI was, and it’s the first one that came to my mind, it didn’t have any direct deaths. It was ridiculously close to having a massive death toll, and it cost like 2 billion to clean up over… decades…?

    • Rakonat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      There are industrial accidents, like fossil fuel plants catching fire and/or exploding, with more casualties than every nuclear ‘disaster’ combined.

      • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Pretty sure people kill more people than any other cause combined.

        Could be wrong. Depends if you count manufactured famine and healthcare crises as part of that.

        We should get off fossil fuels, but I don’t see nuclear as a way of doing that. Solar, wind, and hydro (tidal is interesting. Micro hydro could have uses without destroying entire ecosystems.)