Greens lawmaker Katrin Göring-Eckardt apologized for the post made after Germany’s 2-0 win against Hungary. It comes after a survey showed 21% of Germans would like to see more white players on the national team.

German lawmaker Katrin Göring-Eckardt on Thursday deleted a social media post commenting on the skin color of German football players after it was met with backlash.

She apologized for the post made after Germany’s 2-0 victory over Hungary in their second Euro 2024 stage match on Wednesday.

Göring-Eckhardt is a member of the Greens and vice president of the Bundestag, Germany’s lower house of parliament.

This team is truly exceptional. Just imagine if there were only white German players,” the German lawmaker reportedly said in the now-deleted post on platform X, formerly Twitter.

  • mad_asshatter@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    The article won’t load for me, but I’m sensing ambiguity, judging by the few comments.

    I’m guessing she’s suggesting that the team would actually suck if it were all-white.

    Were bigots outraged here?

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      “This team is truly exceptional. Just imagine if there were only white German players,” the German lawmaker reportedly said in the now-deleted post on platform X, formerly Twitter.

      After removing the post, Göring-Eckhardt apologized, saying: “I was upset that 21% of Germans would prefer to see more ‘whites’ in the national team.”

      “I am proud of this team, and I hope that we can convince the remaining 21%,” she added. “I’m sorry about the way I worded it.”

      She said something that could be taken the opposite of what she meant, so she deleted it and apologized…

      I have zero idea why people in this thread are upset about that.

      Too many people these days think if you apologize it means the other person “wins” I guess. They’re not interested in talking about stuff, just having slap fights. So someone acting like an adult just breaks their brains. They can’t imagine someone handling it like a reasonable person.

    • tobogganablaze@lemmus.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      I’m guessing she’s suggesting that the team would actually suck if it were all-white.

      Yep, though it was worded a bit ambigious. But that wasn’t really what the backlash was about …

      Were bigots outraged here?

      Guess again.

    • narc0tic_bird@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      I’m guessing that’s what she meant, but I think no matter which way she meant it (either that the team would be worse all-white or better all-white), it’s not a good comment to make either way as I don’t see how skin color relates to skill.

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        The players on the team are there because they’re the best available.

        If you changed that based on race, then it’s racist.

        She meant that if the team picked the best white people, the team wouldn’t be as good.

        Just like if the team picked no white people, it wouldn’t be the best.

        I legitimately don’t get why people think it’s racist that she pointed out the team won while being mixed race, and might not have won if they tried to have a racially homogeneous team over just the best available players.

        Like, can you explain your logic for saying her pointing out making race more important than skill would lead to a worse team is somehow racist?

        I genuinely want to understand how you got to that conclusion, and no one else wants to explain how they did either.