Let’s say they have roughly the same usable volume.

  • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    The back cupboard would be hard to reach, but I think the thigh drawer would rattle around too much. I’m going back.

  • edgemaster72@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    4 months ago

    I was gonna say thigh because it’s more easily accessible than lower back, but then you’d probably have to take off your pants or w/e you’re rocking below the waist to get at it, which would be awkward in public. Lower back would be slightly better in that regard and might be able to provide some structural help to the spine, so I’m gonna say lower back.

  • dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    4 months ago

    Thigh. That’s easier to get to and so arguably more useful.

    The only real problem comes when traveling. Leave something metallic in there and that’s a difficult conversation with airport security.

    • threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      That’s easier to get to

      Is it? It seems easier (and more socially acceptable) to lift up one’s shirt than to partially remove one’s skirt/pants.

  • FollyDolly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    I’m gonna say thigh. My body is so janky my first thought is the lower back storage would keep falling open and spilling my stuff out behind me. I could keep the thigh compartment shut with thigh high socks and wear a loose skirt so I can get to it fairly easily. And I could use it as a cup holder on long drives.