• Bernie_Sandals@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 months ago

    Not a place you’d want to live in.

    Of course not, which is why it’s unfair to lump in welfare state creators like the demsoc parties of western Europe, and the brutal leninist parties of Asia and Eastern Europe.

    • BlackLaZoR@kbin.run
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      the demsoc parties of western Europe

      They often have socialism in their name, but I don’t really consider them socialist, as you said - they’re welfare state supporters, which is really, really far away from socialism in soviet controlled eastern europe

      • Bernie_Sandals@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        which is really, really far away from socialism in soviet controlled eastern europe

        In that it’s democratic and they want to expand rights from just being political to also being economic? Yes I agree, they’re severely different from the Soviet style parties, but that doesn’t make them not socialist, their left wing members will usually still argue for the ownership of the means of production by workers, usually they just argue for cooperatives rather than mass nationalization nowadays.

      • Cethin@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 month ago

        No, of course. Only the bad things are socialist! The good ones clearly are not true socialist! /s

        You’re pretty fucking stupid my man. Leftism is as broad as anything else, and socialism can take a wide variety of forms and positions. Authoritarianism is the thing that causes issues, and that can be anywhere on the left, right, and center. In the traditional political compass (which isn’t worth much, but whatever) there’s left/right as liberal/conservative, but there’s also up/down as authority/liberty.