If you ask me, I’m upset no one picked up that this consideration was sexist and racist, although it is indeed the best choice for her to win, which reflects how bad US can’t get over race and gender.

    • Fermion@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Yes, he was the first orange person to be hired as president. He was hired despite Hillary getting more votes because he was the DEI candidate.

    • RedditWanderer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      This meme is so inaccurate. Everyone knows he can’t say Kamala. Isn’t it weird people think you should elect someone who can’t even pronounce someone’s name?

      • Phegan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        He was to build a bridge to the evangelicals, they were all originally super skeptical of trump and needed pence.

        In some circles they were voting for trump, hoping he got impeached so they could have pence.

        All of that has shifted and Trump is their second coming, but originally, it was not like this.

  • merc@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Almost all VPs are DEI hires.

    Trump chose Pence because he had government experience and his religious conservatism helped reassure the GOP’s religious voters.

    Biden choosing Harris:

    Biden committed to selecting a woman as his running mate … He noted that his selection would likely be younger than he is

    Obama choosing Biden:

    Obama recalled that he and his advisers Axelrod and Plouffe wondered if voters would accept a ticket of “two relatively young, inexperienced, and liberal civil rights attorneys” and ultimately Obama felt the contrast between him and Biden was a strength, and that Biden being older than Obama would reassure those voters who were concerned that Obama was too young to be president

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2008_Democratic_Party_vice_presidential_candidate_selection

    Bush Jr. choosing Cheney

    By picking Cheney, Bush had a running mate who had years of experience as well as an extensive foreign policy expertise.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2000_Republican_Party_vice_presidential_candidate_selection

    Clinton was an exception:

    In making the selection, Clinton emphasized Gore’s experience with foreign policy and environmental issues.[1] Clinton’s choice of a fellow young southern centrist defied conventional wisdom

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1992_Democratic_Party_vice_presidential_candidate_selection

    This pattern goes through the years. If the presidential candidate is a northerner, they often pick a southerner. If he’s old, he chooses a younger VP candidate. If he’s from a wealthy background, he chooses someone who has a more humble background. If he lacks political experience, he chooses someone who has it. If he lacks international experience, he chooses someone who has it.

    All VPs are DEI hires, at least to some extent. It’s accepted that if the two candidates are too similar that the ticket will fail.

    • Skullgrid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      If he lacks political experience, he chooses someone who has it. If he lacks international experience, he chooses someone who has it.

      I mean, this just sounds like good teamwork

  • robolemmy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    All VPs are basically picked because of what they are more than who they are. Since there aren’t a lot of actual duties assigned by the constitution, VPs are just picked to help win the election. That means their age, gender, skin color, birthplace, etc are more important than their achievements. That means almost all VPs, including Vance, are “DEI hires.”

    • Moneo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I’d argue Walz bucks this trend, at least to a certain degree. His progressive policy and seemingly unwavering integrity seems to be a huge reason he was picked. They’ve leaned into his achievements and republicans are desperately grasping at straws trying to criticize him.

        • nomous@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          8 years of Harris and then 8 years of Walz.

          16 years isn’t much in the grand scheme but maybe in that time The Left can wake up and mobilize and actually make some progress towards election reforms so we can start un-fucking the last 50 years of GOP-Heritage Foundation Trickledown Reaganomics Bullshit that’s destroying the country.

  • BlackPenguins@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Vance is also a DEI hire. They didn’t want two geriatrics on the ticket so they chose someone young. Diversity in age. DEI can be spun many ways. It’s not a bad thing.

    • Sabata@ani.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      I wish to have that job one day. I may even be overqualified as I’m quite pale.

  • SSJMarx@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    I hated the way this was framed from the start, tbh I’d be more excited if she had chosen to buck expectations and put a non white guy in there.

    I mean, what are dems gonna do? Not vote for her?

    • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Democrats not voting for Harris is a real threat. What you’re describing is called voter apathy. Historically speaking the republicans win the elections with the highest amount of voter apathy. Democrats win in situatioms where higher voter turnout exists.

      Essentially speaking, the democrats biggest enemy is themselves.

      • MindTraveller@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        And voter apathy usually happens when the democrats drift too far to the right. It’s not a concern when they go left.