• Peffse@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    I love how the arstechnica article words it like you will never need FAT32 and it’s silly to consider it.

    I had to download fat32format I don’t know how many times because I needed to format an extra large SD Card or USB drive for some device. Microsoft really shafted exFAT’s adoption with their licensing.

    • Moin@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      Yep, many smart TVs still only accept FAT32 format. I have to split my HDR videos into multiple files to be able to watch them on TV — because of 4GiB size limit.

    • jonne@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      I personally haven’t had to touch it in over a decade, but I guess there’s probably some uses for it still, yeah.

    • cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      FAT32 is also really simple to implement. Supporting exFAT may require a larger microcontroller with more memory, which results in a more expensive product.