It sounds way less offensive to those who decry the original terminology’s problematic roots but still keeps its meaning intact.

  • prime_number_314159@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    29 days ago

    I think very few people mind changing it, and a few people want it changed, so it’s slowly shifting across various use cases. I’ve only discussed the change from master/slave terminology with one person that affirmatively supported the change, and they didn’t know that there’s still slavery in the world today.

    I don’t know what to make of that, other than to say ending human slavery ought to be a higher priority than ending references to it.

    • shrugs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      29 days ago

      I think very few people mind changing it

      I doubt that. Do you know how many system configurations depend on these keywords? Do you have any idea how many hours of work and system outages this would cause?