• Buffalox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    26 days ago

    That’s a weird claim, when the Central Park Five were speakes at the DNC, probably the most well known symbol against death penalty.
    And the democrats have both a presidential candidate and VP candidate that are clearly against the death penalty.

    Download the party program pdf:
    Link to page:
    https://democrats.org/where-we-stand/party-platform/

    Direct link to download:
    https://democrats.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/2020-Democratic-Party-Platform.pdf

    Page 38 of the party program:
    >And Democrats continue to support abolishing the death penalty.

    Article is bullshit because the claim in the headline:

    Democrats Abandoned Their Anti-Death Penalty Stance.

    Is easily refuted by the facts of the policies of their candidates.

    And the claim below the headline:

    remove death penalty opposition from their party platform.

    Is evidently false. It’s right there on page 38 of their official program!!!

      • Buffalox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        24 days ago

        Imagine how wonderful it would be, if journalists linked sources that are essential to their story.
        That said, this is not their official program, it’s based heavily on Biden policies, not Kamala Harris.
        I imagine with Harris as their new candidate, democrats will make a new program. As it is, this program is basically meaningless. Both Harris and Walz strongly oppose death penalty.
        So I maintain the story is grossly misleading. As is evident by the invitation of one of the Exonerated Five to the DNC.

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      25 days ago

      I was unable to find any mention of it in the 2024 platform. But then they didn’t even have time to change the names in it. So I’m not sure what, if anything, it actually signifies.

  • tootoughtoremember@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    26 days ago

    They keep bragging about many Republicans they had on stage. Great, I guess the Democrats are just the Republicans from 10-20 years ago if those speakers find the current Democratic party palatable. I’m sure that will rally people to vote blue like they did in 2008. Was it caving on immigration, peace, and crime what made Obama so popular?

    • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      26 days ago

      This is why I think it’s not impossible that we’ll have a party swap where these right wing politicians all become the new democratic party and the progressives fuck off to form a new left wing.

  • Jagothaciv@kbin.earth
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    25 days ago

    I think the Intercept is junk. Jeremy left to make another org btw so yea this is propaganda for whomever paid the bill.

      • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        26 days ago

        Sure is tiresome, people bringing up how the very first time that centrists decided to stand for anything, it was the wholesale slaughter of Palestinians.

        • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          26 days ago

          Pretty sure the centrists stood for abortion access before making their stance on Palestine clear - remember that time a few days after Biden stepped down when even yall downvoted anything critical of Harris?

          Politicians aren’t a matter of black and white… Harris is a mixed bag… And her election would result in the least number of dead Palestinians out of any of the options. Vote for her if you don’t want to continue advocating for genocide.

          • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            26 days ago

            Pretty sure the centrists stood for abortion access

            Which is why they codified roe when they had the chance.

            Vote for her if you don’t want to continue advocating for genocide.

            I AM ALREADY VOTING FOR HER. I get that you just want everyone to shut up while we support genocide, but some of us have misgivings about the only thing that any centrist can be counted on to actually stand for.

            • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              26 days ago

              Oh hey, as long as we’re all voting for her and not advocating for a different candidate then I have no objections to protesting events or otherwise advocating to push her further to the left. I just object to advocates for a third party candidate (simply due to America’s voting system).

              • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                26 days ago

                Oh hey, don’t accuse people of being trumpists or third party advocates just because they’re not 100% on board with genocide like you are.

                • DeanFogg@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  25 days ago

                  So one of you didn’t want to use the genocide as political tool and the other of you just wanted to let everyone know that genocide is bad and its all the dems fault? Not the nutjob known as nethanyahu

                • homicidalrobot@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  25 days ago

                  Nobody is on board with genocide and posting it in direct reply to people who are advocating the less genocide-hungry candidate just makes you look like an attention seeking idiot. Nobody is going to know you’re a centrist when it appears you are equating the obviously less genocide-intent candidate with the vocally genocidal one. You are not brave for doing the bare minimum.

        • Nuke_the_whales@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          26 days ago

          I remember 20 years ago when y’all wanted every Arab/Muslim including Palestinians dead and tore through a continent to do it. Now you take the moral high ground after killing thousands

          • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            26 days ago

            There was a widespread and very active resistance to the wars at that time.

            Not to mention, many protesters for Palestinian liberation were children or not even born at that time.

            • Nuke_the_whales@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              25 days ago

              Americans. Every one of you who backed post 9/11 invasions which was pretty much the whole country except the Dixie chicks

              • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                25 days ago

                You see, this is part of why I’m so opposed to the current genocide. A casual observer of history might assume that because no politicians were against it, no citizens were.