• TheDarksteel94@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    17
    ·
    14 days ago

    The thing being stolen is the advertisers ability to advertise, which in turn pays for the platform. So, it is stealing from the platform.

    Also, if you take a quick look at the pamphlet and throw it away, that’s the same thing as looking at an ad and ignoring it afterwards. You were still looking at it, so the ad did its job.

    Btw, don’t get me wrong, I also use ad blockers for a lot of things. But I do pay for anything that I use for a good amount of time, like Youtube, video games, movies or music.

    • dustyData@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      14 days ago

      Nope, you’re not taking anything away from the advertiser. They are free to display but they’re not entitled to being watched. You don’t get penalized for ignoring or closing your eyes during trailers at the cinema. But that is exactly what arguing against ad blockers is. The entitlement of advertisers to your attention. This fundamentally breaks the social contract of ads. Imagine corporations arguing that municipal anti-billboard laws are theft

      • TheDarksteel94@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        14 days ago

        I’m not arguing against ad blockers, I’m arguing that they are still a form of piracy. Also, if you go to a cinema, you’ve presumably already paid for the ticket, so the cinema has already made money from you…

      • Aatube@kbin.melroy.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        14 days ago

        Yes you are. When closing your eyes during trailers, the cinema still gets paid. When blocking ads, websites don’t get paid.* Billboards are also different, as they don’t give you some sort of service benefit except “land”; they’re equivalent to domain parking ads which are absolutely awful, for which I see no plausible justification whatsoever.

        *There was this fork of µblock that tried to just hide them instead of removing them, but that didn’t seem to work when I tried it. I also forgot the name.

    • Transient Punk@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      14 days ago

      Does that make me a pirate if I go to the bathroom during commercial breaks? If I get to a theater late and miss the commercials, am I a pirate?

      • TheDarksteel94@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        14 days ago

        You’ve already paid to view the movie, it’s not funded by ads. Same with commercial breaks. I presume you’re already paying for the channel or service in some form.

      • SolOrion@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        14 days ago

        No. The owner of the media has already been paid in both of those scenarios. It makes zero difference to them whether you’re watching the ads.

        Adblocking, on the other hand, is actively hurting the owner of the media because they get paid based on how many ads they can serve. If you block the ad, it isn’t served, and they don’t get paid.

        Personally, I definitely think it’s piracy. I also still do it.

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      14 days ago

      The thing being stolen is the advertisers ability to advertise, which in turn pays for the platform. So, it is stealing from the platform.

      FUUUUUUUUUUUUCK THIS! You seem to think they are somehow entitled to force people to view their shit. They are NOT! I have sovereignty over my computer and my eyeballs, and I have every right to control what happens to them.

      • TheDarksteel94@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        14 days ago

        Okay, and you are not entitled to use the platform. How do you suppose people are to keep it running? Charity? Good luck with that. In the case of Youtube or Twitch, video streaming is more expensive than you can imagine.