299792458ms@lemmy.zip to linuxmemes@lemmy.world · edit-212 days agoSnap out of itlemmy.zipimagemessage-square133fedilinkarrow-up1756arrow-down120file-text
arrow-up1736arrow-down1imageSnap out of itlemmy.zip299792458ms@lemmy.zip to linuxmemes@lemmy.world · edit-212 days agomessage-square133fedilinkfile-text
minus-squarehperrin@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up17arrow-down1·12 days agoMy software, QuickDAV, is not in the AUR. It’s open source, and I release it only as an AppImage, because I am lazy.
minus-squarefolkrav@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up20arrow-down1·12 days agoI guess we should have added the word “notable” I’m terribly sorry, you left the door wide open ;) I’m curious, what makes AppImage a good choice for the lazy developer? Is it easier to create?
minus-squarehperrin@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up17·12 days agoOuch. xD It’s super easy to create. And you distribute it on your own, so it’s basically like an installer exe on Windows. In my mind it’s one step above only offering source code.
minus-squareoldfart@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up2·12 days agoThere’s so much random, useful software distributed only as appimages. But not notable enough for packaging fanboys.
My software, QuickDAV, is not in the AUR. It’s open source, and I release it only as an AppImage, because I am lazy.
I guess we should have added the word “notable”
I’m terribly sorry, you left the door wide open ;)
I’m curious, what makes AppImage a good choice for the lazy developer? Is it easier to create?
Ouch. xD
It’s super easy to create. And you distribute it on your own, so it’s basically like an installer exe on Windows. In my mind it’s one step above only offering source code.
There’s so much random, useful software distributed only as appimages. But not notable enough for packaging fanboys.