MIT engineers and collaborators developed a solar-powered device that avoids salt-clogging issues of other designs.

  • Tarastie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    multiple universities up to 30 years ago

    We can make 30 liters of pure water with the fresnel lense from a junk projection TV just by putting two of them over a water tank…

    https://www.ijrer.org/ijrer/index.php/ijrer/article/view/3092

    MIT now

    We designed a severely complicated ten stage solar collector despite our 20 previous publications about massively simple and cheap methods of doing the same thing that we said each time was revolutionary in water production/collection.

    Congratulations MIT. Can we just build some of these instead of finding/funding more?

    • linearchaos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      1 year ago

      Desalination can be as easy as evaporation. But the volume over time is abysmal.

      The faster you clean it the faster you build up the salt.

      Like everything, problems appear at scale that aren’t even a concern at the individual level.

  • Wooster@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 year ago

    With my (admittedly limited) understanding of the topic, extracting the water from ocean water is a relatively simple process.

    The problem is what do you do with the brine afterwards. The process featured in the article makes it harder for the brine to clog the system, which is admittedly an important step. But you can’t put the brine back into the ocean without risking killing local wildlife.

    And I’m not under the impression that there are any practical uses for brine, at least not at that scale.

    • trackindakraken@lemmy.whynotdrs.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      There are no perfect solutions.

      Of course, we’ll put the brine back into the ocean. We can run pipelines out miles to disperse the brine and dilute it. We’ll need regulation to ensure this, because no capitalist corporation will do anything that cuts into profits without regulations forcing it.

      Second only to air, fresh water is what we all need. We’ll do what we must to have it. Of this I’m certain.

    • Kache@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Maybe have ocean voyaging ships (e.g. container ships) do controlled release of brine through their journey?

      Though probably no way of achieving this via current economic and legal systems. Even if attempted today, ships would probably be incentivized to dump the entire payload the moment they cross into internal waters.

    • Sanchokan@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      Would it be posible to salinate the waste water that goes back to the ocean from treatment plants?

      • interceder270@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think the problem is that it’s too salinated and needs to be put back into the ocean slowly over a wide area.

        • Dark Arc@social.packetloss.gg
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Well this would be mixing the treated water with the salt … which in theory should get close-ish to the amount of water put into the system/the original balance

          It actually sounds pretty reasonable at least on the surface.

          Another idea might be shipping that off for cheap road ice control in states with winter weather

    • surfrock66@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ve always wondered why we can’t contain the brine and pack it into abandoned salt mines for long-term storage. It would probably inspire some maintenance on abandoned salt mines and prevent cave-ins.

  • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Big box with pipe pointing up in the middle that exits the box through the bottom to reach a collection tank

    Fill with salt water without going past the pipe opening

    Add transparent lid with a slope towards the middle so the water condenses and drops in the pipe

    Go do whatever you want all day, you’ve got a passive drinking water creator and nothing to clog since solids just accumulate at the bottom and can be scooped out as needed.

  • Xavier@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Small question (perhaps dumb on my part as I haven’t slept yet), do these desalination system remove other chemicals such as PFAS, arsenic, lead? I think I read that they use nanofiltration membranes to remove almost everything. How about molecules that are smaller than water (H₂O)? Do they get filtered?

    • GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Most molecules aren’t smaller than water, however filters that are small enough to only let water through clog pretty quickly. That said, most heavy metals and salts won’t evaporate in a decent still (which is good, because atoms and ions are often smaller than water). I’m not sure about PFAS and microplastics, but I expect they don’t evaporate.

  • AlteredStateBlob@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yeah, no. It won’t be cheaper than tap water. The amount of energy required for desalination, clogging or no, is an additional cost on top of what you need to do to get water drinkable with non salinated water. So no matter the energy source, this cost has to be factored in and that will automatically make it more expensive. No free lunches in physics.

    • FooBarrington@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      You are ignoring that saltwater is available in many, many more places than freshwater. Building a local efficient desalination plant can absolutely be more cost-efficient than transporting freshwater for hundreds of kilometres. Don’t simplify so much you lose all perspective.

      • AlteredStateBlob@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I am not ignoring that, it is also vastly more contaminated than fresh water with microplastics and all the other grabage shipping companies and countries have been dumping into it for the better part of a century now.

        I’m not saying it is impossible to do or not a potentially sensible option in certain places, I am saying it is not going to be cheaper than tap water anywhere.

        • GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          This system uses a variant of distillation to desalination the water. This means that a good part of the filtration and purification process required to make most fresh water potable would no longer be necessary, so it could be cheaper than regular tap water, especially in places where the starting water just isn’t that great to begin with. It also is solar powered and looks like it could be pretty scalable, so it may be a viable option.

        • FooBarrington@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’m not saying it is impossible to do or not a potentially sensible option in certain places, I am saying it is not going to be cheaper than tap water anywhere.

          How does this work? If it’s a sensible option in certain places (those without access to tap water), how can tap water be cheaper? Why wouldn’t everybody just bring tap water to those places as well if it was cheaper?

          • AlteredStateBlob@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            It might still be more expensive but more resilient to other external factors such as embargoes, wars, whatever might influence delivery of other water sources. Cost isn’t the only factor to decide what technology or solution should be implemented.

    • Kelsenellenelvial@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      My presumption is that the desalinated water might be cheaper than tap, but would still require further processing to be considered potable, which would raise the price on par or above conventionally sourced tap water. I imagine there’s a lot of costal areas though with ready access to saltwater and minimal access to freshwater where it’s worthwhile.

  • Dizzy Devil Ducky@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Cheaper than tap but at a 500% markup for CoNvEnIeNcE! You know that if it’s cheap, the large black scarf buckets (c*pitalists) will come in and force the prices to go up until nobody can afford it.